首页|不同上坡跑增速策略对男性业余马拉松跑者下肢关节运动学的影响

不同上坡跑增速策略对男性业余马拉松跑者下肢关节运动学的影响

扫码查看
目的:探讨3种不同上坡跑增速策略的男性业余马拉松跑者在步速控制的条件下,下肢关节运动学及垂直地面反作用力的差异性。方法:根据排除和纳入标准,筛选18名业余马拉松运动员,并依据不同的上坡跑增速策略将其随机分为3组,定义G1组为步频增加组(n=6人),G2组为步长增加组(n=6人),G3组为步频步长同时增加组(n=6人),随后采用Vicon红外高速运动捕捉系统和Zebris FDM-T系列步态分析跑台,分别采集受试者在6。6 km/h和10 km/h速度条件下的步态数据、下肢各关节运动角度及垂直地面反作用力峰值,并对其数据进行分析讨论。结果:最终有17人完成了整个实验。从6。6 km/h增速到10 km/h后,支撑腿着地瞬间,G2组的膝关节屈曲角度、踝关节背伸角度大于G1、G3组且均有显著增加,G1、G3组的膝关节屈曲角度、踝关节背伸角度均有一定程度的减小。支撑腿最大缓冲时,G2组3个关节的角度均出现了一定程度的增加,且G1、G3组的角度(除G3组髋关节屈曲角度)都有一定程度的减小。支撑腿蹬离瞬间,3组髋关节伸展角度都有一定程度的增加,G2组膝关节屈曲角度的减小幅度较G3组更为明显,G3组踝关节跖屈角度增加幅度较G1、G2组更大。结论:上坡跑过程中,增加步长和同时增加步长、步频的业余马拉松爱好者,对其膝关节及踝关节的功能需求较大,而步频的增加则对髋关节的功能较为依赖。选用增加步长或步频步长同时增加的增速策略,会带来下肢各关节更高的关节负荷。
Effects of Different Speed-Raising Strategies for Uphill Running on the Arthrokinematics of Lower Limbs in Male Amateur Marathon Runners
Objective: To explore the differences in the arthorkinematics of lower limbs and vertical ground reaction forces in male amateur marathon runners with three different speed-raising strategies for uphill running under the conditions of stride control. Method: According to exclusion and inclusion criteria, eighteen amateur marathon runners were screened and randomly divided into three groups based on different speed-raising strategies for uphill running, defining the G1 group as the stride frequency increasing group (n=6 persons), the G2 group as the stride length increasing group (n=6 persons), and the G3 group as the stride frequency and stride length increasing group (n=6 persons). Then, the treadmill was analyzed by the Vicon infrared high-speed motion capture system and the Zebris FDM-T series gait, the stride data, the movement angle of each joint of lower limbs and the peak value of vertical ground reaction forces of the subjects under the speed conditions of 6.6 km/h and 10 km/h were collected respectively, and finally the data was analyzed and discussed. Result: 17 subjects finally completed the whole experiment, and experimental results were as follows. After increasing the speed from 6.6 km/h to 10 km/h, when the supporting leg was landing, the knee flexion angle and ankle dorsiflexion angle of the G2 group were larger than those of G1 and G3 groups with significant increase, and the knee flexion angle and ankle dorsiflexion angle of G1 and G3 groups decreased to a certain extent.When the supporting leg was maximally cushioned, the angles of the three joints in the G2 group increased to a certain extent, and the angles of G1 and G3 groups (except for the hip flexion angle of the G3 group) decreased to a certain extent. The moment the supporting leg was stomping away, the hip extension angles of the three groups increased to a certain extent, the decrease in the knee flexion angle of the G2 group was more obvious than that of the G3 group, and the increase in the ankle plantar flexion angle of the G3 group was greater than that of G1 and G2 groups. Conclusion: During uphill running, amateur marathon enthusiasts who increase stride length and simultaneously increase stride length and stride frequency have greater demand for the function of their knee and ankle joints, while their increase in stride frequency depends more on the function of hip joints. The choice of the speed-raising strategy of increasing stride length or simultaneously increasing stride frequency and stride length will lead to higher joint loads on all joints of lower limbs.

Uphill runningArthrokinematicsSteep-raising strategyJoint load

黄雅晗、王杰龙、沈翔宇

展开 >

苏州大学体育学院 江苏苏州 215031

上坡跑 关节运动学 增速策略 关节负荷

2024

当代体育科技
当代体育科技杂志社

当代体育科技

影响因子:0.375
ISSN:2095-2813
年,卷(期):2024.14(16)