首页|不同形式诱导的PAP对短跑运动员下肢等长肌力的影响研究

不同形式诱导的PAP对短跑运动员下肢等长肌力的影响研究

扫码查看
该研究旨在探讨不同形式诱导的激活后增强效应(PAP)对短跑运动员下肢等长肌力的影响。通过实验法,以12名男性短跑运动员为实验对象,分别进行45%1RM、120 mmHg加压血流限制结合45%1RM、80%1RM的负重半蹲练习,收集各时间段内的测试结果。结果显示:在120 mmHg加压血流限制结合45%1RM负荷干预下,受试者下肢等长肌力(前群)成绩要优于45%1RM负荷下的成绩,在第7分钟成绩相差最大,P<0。05,具有显著性差异;与45%1RM相比,在80%1RM负荷下,受试者在第1分钟的成绩就有较高提高,P<0。01,具有非常显著性差异,之后在第7分钟成绩相差最大,P<0。01,具有非常显著性差异;120 mmHg加压血流限制结合45%1RM与80%1RM负荷干预相比,实验后各恢复时间点的等长肌力(前群)成绩均无显著性差异;与45%1RM相比,在120 mmHg加压血流限制结合45%1RM负荷干预下,受试者下肢等长肌力(后群)成绩在第7分钟至第16分钟要优于45%1RM等长肌力(后群),但整体P>0。05,不具有显著性差异;在80%1RM负荷干预下,受试者第10至13分钟成绩与45%1RM成绩相差最大,P<0。05,具有显著性差异;与120 mmHg加压血流限制结合45%1RM相比,在80%1RM负荷下,受试者下肢等长肌力(后群肌)成绩更优,但从实验后各恢复时间点来看,两种负荷下的成绩P>0。05,无显著性差异。该研究为短跑运动员的训练提供了理论依据,教练员可根据运动员的具体情况和训练目标,选择合适的负荷干预方式,以提高其运动表现。
Analysis of the Effects of Different Forms of Induced PAP on the Lower Extremity Isometric Muscle Strength of Sprinters
This study aims to investigate the effects of different forms of induced Post-Activation Potentiation(PAP)on the isometric strength of the lower limbs in sprinters.Through experimental methods,12 male sprinters were selected as experimental subjects and subjected to 45%1RM and 120 mmHg pressurized blood flow restriction combined with 45%1RM and 80%1RM weight-bearing half squat exercises,respectively.The results indicated that:Under the intervention of 120 mmHg pressurized blood flow restriction combined with 45%1RM,the isometric strength(anterior group)with of the subjects was better than that under 45%1RM load,with the largest difference in performance at the 7th minute,P<0.05,indicating a significant difference;Compared with 45%1RM,under 80%1RM load,the subjects showed a significant improvement in their performance in the first minute,P<0.01,with a very significant difference.The greatest difference in performance was observed in the seventh minute,P<0.01,with a very significant difference;Compared with the intervention of 45%1RM and 80%1RM load,there was no significant difference in the results of isometric muscle strength(anterior group)at each recovery time point after the experiment,when using 120 mmHg pressurized blood flow restriction combined with 45%1RM;Compared with 45%1RM,under the intervention of 120 mmHg pressurized blood flow restriction combined with 45%1RM load,the lower limb isometric muscle strength(posterior group)of the subjects was better than that of the 45%1RM isometric muscle strength(posterior group)from the 7th to the 16th minute,but the overall P value was greater than 0.05,and there was no significant difference;Under the intervention of 80%1RM load,the difference between the 10th to 13th minute scores of the subjects and the 45%1RM scores was the largest,with a significant difference,P<0.05;Compared with 120 mmHg pressurized blood flow restriction combined with 45%1RM,under 80%1RM load,the subjects had better results in lower limb isometric muscle strength(posterior group muscle).However,from the perspective of various recovery time points after the experiment,the results under the two loads were P>0.05,with no significant difference.This study provides a theoretical basis for the training of sprinters,and coaches can choose appropriate load intervention methods based on the specific situation and training objectives of the athletes to improve their athletic performance.

PAPSprinterLower extremity isometric muscle strengthDifferent intervention loads

蒋家鑫、杨坡

展开 >

河南体育学院 河南郑州 450000

河北传媒学院艺术体育学院 河北石家庄 051430

激活后增强效应 短跑运动员 下肢等长肌力 不同干预负荷

2024

当代体育科技
当代体育科技杂志社

当代体育科技

影响因子:0.375
ISSN:2095-2813
年,卷(期):2024.14(28)