首页|北方农村不同取暖方式家庭室内PM2.5污染差异及清洁取暖效果

北方农村不同取暖方式家庭室内PM2.5污染差异及清洁取暖效果

扫码查看
农村散煤使用对冬季重污染等贡献显著,更会直接污染室内空气,影响人群健康.除了"煤改电、煤改气"之外,清洁煤和成型生物质也被认为是降低散煤污染的有效途径,在一些政策和行动中被推广.然而,目前还缺乏不同取暖模式下居民室内空气质量差异及取暖排放贡献的定量研究,是清洁取暖环境效益评估中的短板.本文在北方农村地区开展了覆盖1600户整个取暖季的细颗粒物(PM2.5)实地监测,分析了居民室内PM2.5污染的空间差异及不同取暖方式的影响.研究表明,北方农村取暖季室内PM2.5浓度均值为102μg/m3,但户间差异很大,从19μg/m3到497 μg/m3.使用传统散煤和生物质取暖的家庭,取暖季室内PM2.5浓度高达162 μg/m3和144 μg/m3.而使用清洁煤或成型生物质取暖的家庭,室内PM2.5显著降低,约为84 μg/m3,且有56%的时间日均浓度超过国家标准(50μg/m3).电或气取暖的家庭,室内PM2.5浓度最低.受人为活动强度和气象条件等因素影响,居民室内PM2.5浓度的户内变异也很明显,使用固体燃料的家庭相对变异系数约为76%,远大于使用清洁燃料的家庭(53%).室内传统固体燃料燃烧排放对室内PM2.5的贡献约60%,而随着取暖燃料的清洁化,室内燃烧源贡献逐渐降低.若仅考虑降低室内PM2.5,使用成型生物质或清洁煤替代传统散煤可取得显著的减污效果,电替代的降污效果最大.研究为认识室内空气污染变化规律和空间异质性,全面客观地评估清洁取暖对人群健康影响提供了基础数据和科学支撑.
Variability in indoor PM2.5 from homes using different heating energies and impacts of clean heating in rural northern China
Indoor combustion of low-quality coal chunks significantly contributes to wintertime haze episodes and directly affects indoor air quality,posing high risks to human health.Besides electricity or gaseous fuels,clean coals and pelletized biofuels have been proposed as alternative fuels to reduce pollutant emissions associated with raw coal burning in some policies and pilot projects.However,there is still a lack of quantitative evaluation on real-world indoor air quality from homes using different heating fuels.This limits a comprehensive understanding of the environmental and health co-benefits of clean heating policy.In this study,indoor fine particulate matter(PM2.5)was measured from 1600 households located in rural north China.The aim was to assess indoor PM2.5 variations within and between different homes and attribute the pollution differences to heating types.The study found that the average indoor PM2.5 during the heating period was 102 μg/m3,but it varied greatly from 19 to 497 μg/m3.In the home burning traditional coals and biomass fuels,the indoor PM2.5 concentrations were as high as 162 μg/m3 and 144 μg/m3,respectively,while in the home using clean coals or biomass pellets,the indoor PM2.5 levels were significantly lower,at about 84 μg/m3,although this still exceeded the national standard(50 μg/m3)during more than 56%of the entire monitoring period.The lowest indoor PM2.5 levels were observed in the home using clean modern energies like electricity or gas for heating.Due to distinct human activity intensities and meteorological conditions,the indoor PM2.5 also varied greatly from day to day.The coefficient of variation(COV)in indoor PM2.5 from different days was approximately 76%in the home using solid fuels,while it averaged 53%in the home using clean energies.Internal combustion sources contributed to about 60%of indoor PM2.5 in the home burning traditional solid fuels.When switching to cleaner household energies,internal combustion emission contributions declined obviously.To lower indoor PM2.5 levels,low-quality dirty coals should be suspended and replaced by cleaner energies like pelletized biofuels or clean coals,and the most significant reduction would be achieved by switching from coals to electricity.The present study provides empirical evidence from first-hand observational data to enhance the understanding of indoor air pollution variability.It supports a comprehensive scientific evaluation of clean heating policy in terms of air pollution mitigation and human health protection.

rural areaindoor PM2.5inter-and intra-household variationssolid fuelsclean heating

李尧捷、门亚泰、罗智瀚、刘新蕾、程和发、陶澍、沈国锋

展开 >

北京大学城市与环境学院地表过程分析与模拟教育部重点实验室,北京 100871

农村 室内PM2.5 户间户内差异 固体燃料 清洁取暖

中国科学院战略性先导科技专项

XDA23010100

2024

地理学报
中国地理学会 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所

地理学报

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:3.3
ISSN:0375-5444
年,卷(期):2024.79(1)
  • 24