首页|"点—轴系统"理论与其他相关空间发展模式的比较

"点—轴系统"理论与其他相关空间发展模式的比较

扫码查看
选取中心地理论的k=4系统、增长极和发展轴、走廊或轴线发展、增长极与增长中心、节点与走廊发展模式、小尺度发展轴模式等6个具有空间意义的发展模式与"点—轴系统"理论进行比较,目标在于获得后者与前者在模式或理论的问题关注点、核心内容和观念等方面的异同点。研究发现:前6个模式分别揭示或关注产业关联或/和线状基础设施在空间经济发展中的各种作用,以及这些作用中某些作用的相互影响,并提出各种空间发展主张;同时上述6个模式考虑的每一种作用力在现实的带状经济系统中都有可能起作用。但是,"点—轴系统"提出渐进式扩散的"点—轴"及其等级系统生成机制,并主张把此生成机制与区域资源环境和发展潜力进行整合,以确定中国的空间开发顺序,是其区别于前述其他几个模式的重要特点。
Comparison between"pole-axis system"theory and other related spatial development models
The k=4 system of the central place theory,growth pole and development axis,corridor or axis development,growth pole and growth center,poles and corridors development,and the small-scale development axis are typical development models with spatial significance.In this article,we compare them with the"pole-axis system"theory proposed by Chinese geographer,Lu Dadao,and investigate the similarities and differences in terms of core ideas,attentions and structures.It is shown that these six models have respectively discovered or concerned the various roles of industrial linkages or/and linear infrastructure in spatial economic development,focusing on spatial interaction mechanisms of some roles and also have spatial development propositions.Each of the six models may contribute to the studies on real striped economic system in some ways.However,the"pole-axis system"proposes the gradual diffusion of"pole-axis"and its hierarchical system generation mechanism,and integrates the generation mechanism of the"pole-axis system"with regional resources,environment,and development potential to determine the order of China's spatial development.It is the key feature that distinguishes the"pole-axis system"from the other aforementioned models.

"pole-axis system"theorypoles and corridors developmentaxis-based developmentgrowth polek=4 system

梁进社

展开 >

北京师范大学地理科学学部,北京 100875

"点—轴系统"理论 节点与走廊发展模式 轴线发展 增长极 k=4系统

2024

地理学报
中国地理学会 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所

地理学报

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:3.3
ISSN:0375-5444
年,卷(期):2024.79(12)