Analysis and insights on major geoinformation security management models foreign countries
Geoinformation data serves both economic development and national defense needs.Due to the rapid development of digital technology and changes in the international situation,foreign countries have attached great importance to geoinformation security management in recent years.The management models of foreign countries have important reference significance for management practices in China.However,current research has a vague understanding of foreign geoinformation security management and lags behind in terms of timeliness.At the same time,this research is not systematic enough and lacks international comparison under a unified background.Addressing these issues,this paper selected typical countries such as the United States,Germany,the United Kingdom,Japan,and South Korea as research objects through literature review and online research.The basic situations of geoinformation security management from the aspects of legislation,management system,data classification management,market access,foreign investment,and cross-border flow are compared and analyzed.The major geoinformation security management models were summarized.This paper pointed out three geoinformation security management models and their corresponding characteristics:the United States,Europe,and East Asia.The American model has the characteristics of focused containment under one-way transparency,non-expansion of classification range,and standardization-driven regulation.The characteristic of the European model is the implementation of unified legislation within the region,with privacy protection as the entry point of regulation.The East Asian model implements unified management and specialized legislation due to geopolitical factors and historical background.This paper analyzed the commonalities and differences of various management models and found that countries are increasingly valuing geoinformation security management,with foreign investment and cross-border flows as key limiting measures,and adopting a data classification supervision model.However,due to different national conditions,different countries may have differences in their starting points and implementation paths.The management of geoinformation security is influenced by various geopolitical factors.Regardless of the mode,it is always based on serving their interests and needs as the starting point.Institutional differences are a key factor affecting its regulatory philosophy and implementation path.Based on the comparison of geoinformation security management models,this paper proposed its implications for the practice of geoinformation security management in China.The first is to accelerate the change in the concept of geoinformation security management,from"maintaining national security equals confidentiality"to the hierarchical management of"confidential-important(core)-general",and promote the return of classified data to national defense and military attributes.The second is to carry out specialized legislation on geoinformation security,timely improve the policy and legal system related to geoinformation data confidentiality and security,and strengthen the institutional guarantee of geoinformation security supervision.The third is to establish a classification management system and supporting measures for classified,important(core),and general geoinformation data.The fourth is to adopt a regulatory approach of"lenient entry and strict management"to promote the transformation of geoinformation security management from relying on administrative coercion to"multi-party governance".The fifth is to build a geoinformation security technology prevention and control system,continuously enhancing technical prevention and regulatory capabilities.
geoinformation security,legislationconfidentialitygraded managementcross border flows,governance system
NETL
NSTL
万方数据
