人文关怀与国家叙事:论批判遗产研究的两种旨趣
Humanistic Care and National Narratives:Two Orientations in Critical Heritage Studies
徐梓又 1张丽1
作者信息
- 1. 江南大学马克思主义学院 江苏无锡 214000
- 折叠
摘要
批判遗产研究的讨论由权威遗产话语的不合理性引发.国内外研究都对权威遗产话语展开了批评,在重构遗产话语路径时,呈现出两种不同的旨趣.国外学界旨在批判精英与专家话语,强调个人与社区对遗产的参与,凸显人文关怀;国内学界则依据历史传统,旨在破除西方话语霸权,强调国家在场,展现出宏大叙事的特征.人文关怀与国家叙事在不同的社会背景下有不同的生成逻辑,皆是欧洲话语权威渐失背景下世界遗产"去西方中心化"的体现,但也揭示出国内外对遗产价值的不同侧重.在我国土司遗产保护上,将人文关怀与国家叙事旨趣相融合,创造更加包容的遗产话语体系,有利于铸牢中华民族共同体意识.
Abstract
Critical heritage studies have increasingly questioned the adequacy of traditional,authorita-tive heritage discourses.Both domestic and international research has challenged these discourses,yet they diverge significantly in their approaches to reconstructing heritage narratives.International scholars typical-ly focus on elite and expertise-driven discourses,promoting the involvement of individuals and communities in heritage processes and emphasizing humanistic care.In contrast,domestic scholars within certain histori-cal traditions seeks to challenge Western discourse hegemony,emphasizing the role of the state and adopting a grand narrative approach.These differing orientations,rooted in different social contexts,embody the global trend of"de-Westernization"in world heritage under the waning authority of European-centric narratives,while also revealing divergent emphases on the value of heritage.The integration of humanistic care with na-tional narratives,as seen in the preservation of Tusi heritage,illustrates efforts to forge a more inclusive heri-tage discourse system,potentially strengthening the consciousness of the Chinese national community.
关键词
遗产话语/人文关怀/国家叙事/土司遗产/共同体意识Key words
heritage discourse/humanistic care/national narrative/Tusi heritage/community con-sciousness引用本文复制引用
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
万方数据