首页|中国南海历史性权利的"历史性"新探

中国南海历史性权利的"历史性"新探

扫码查看
世界历史理论是总结人类社会发展规律的宏理论,亦因其在论述上的开放性与时代性,值得学界从不同角度借鉴、完善和发展.对历史性权利的研究长期聚焦于国际法中的"权利",而对于历史哲学层面的"历史性"探索不够深入.通过借鉴反思既有的中美博弈视阈、权利内涵类推、权利外延归纳和史料证据转化四类研究,并结合马克思世界历史理论重视解放、面向未来、鼓励交往和主张多元这四大精髓,可尝试对历史性水域与历史性权利再定义,进而阐释历史性权利本质上是一种有待在历史实践中不断发展的权利形态.据此,南海历史性权利的"历史性"意义,体现为主体性意义、交往性意义、非经济性意义和程序性意义.彰显历史性权利的主体性意义,不仅需要借助军事领域的拒止能力排除霸权国干涉,更要排除霸权逻辑对南海各方商谈与解决争端自主性的干预.完善历史性权利的交往性意义需要创建南海的回应型法治,重视基于共同体逻辑的间性真理.完善历史性权利的非经济性意义,即海域专属经济区的功能保全需要非经济性措施,尝试针对海洋生物资源养护和生态环境保护的权利创设主体间性、事项性和空间性义务.发挥历史性权利的程序性意义,应依循法的未完成态才是法的常态之规律,提出更加细致的共识类型和方案,深化公共外交,探寻国际关系的公共性.
A New Exploration of the Historicity of China's Historic Rights in the South China Sea
The theory of world history is a grand theory summarizing the law of human social development,notable for its openness and relevance to contemporary discourse and valuable for cultivating,refining and developing from various perspectives.Research on historical rights has long focused on"rights"within international law,while exploration of"historicity"from the perspective of historical philosophy has been comparatively underdeveloped.This paper seeks to redefine historic waters and historic rights by examining and reflecting on four existing research approaches(conflicts between China and the United States,analogies of rights content,denotation of rights and transformation of historical evidence)and four essences of Marxist world history theory(emphasis on liberation,future orientation,encouragement of interaction,and advocacy of plurality).Then it explains that historic rights are essentially a form of rights that must continually develop within historical practice.From the dimension of the"historicity"of the South China Sea historic rights,it analyzes their subjective,interactive,non-economic,and procedural significance.To enhance the interactive significance of historic rights,a responsive rule of law framework should be established in the South China Sea,emphasizing inter-subjective truth grounded in a community-oriented logic.Developing the non-economic significance of historic rights,particularly in preserving the function of Exclusive Economic Zones,calls for non-economic measures to uphold obligations between states,focusing on marine biological conservation and ecological protection through obligations that are inter-subjective,issue-specific,and spatially bound.To leverage the procedural significance of historic rights,recognizing the norm of law as inherently"unfinished"suggests more detailed consensus types and solutions,deepening public diplomacy efforts to explore the publicness of international relations.

Historic RightsSouth China Sea Rights ProtectionTheory of World HistoryCommunity of a Shared Future for MankindSouth China Sea Arbitration

吕嘉欣

展开 >

武汉大学中国边界与海洋研究院、国家领土主权与海洋权益协同创新中心

武汉大学国家治理与公共政策研究中心

历史性权利 南海维权 世界历史理论 人类命运共同体 "南海仲裁案"

2024

南亚东南亚研究
云南省社会科学院

南亚东南亚研究

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.343
ISSN:1674-6392
年,卷(期):2024.(4)