Monitoring and Preventing the Risk of Returning to Poverty in Rural Tourism Places in the Context of Common Prosperity: Taking Nanping Village of Guangdong Province as Example
Taking Nanping Village in Guangdong as a research case, the study comprehensively utilized the AHP hierarchical analysis method, entropy weight method and comprehensive index method to evaluate its return-to-poor risk in multiple dimensions and identify its return-to-poor risk pattern and rank, and finally constructed a return-to-poor risk prevention mechanism for tourism-based villages. The results are as followings:(1) The various risks of returning to poverty in Nanping Village, in descending order, are economic conditions, human capital, pol-icy support, development opportunities, social security, natural capital, and economic conditions become the domi-nant type of poverty return risk in the village. (2) The risk types of the six poverty return dimensions that are lower than the overall mean of the largest number of farmers are government support, development opportunities, and hu-man capital, in order, summarizing the above, while the risk pattern of farmers returning to poverty can be classi-fied into two categories:low-growth returning to poverty and low-asset returning to poverty. (3) Comprehensively analyze the above analysis, construct the monitoring and preventive mechanism of poverty return risk in rural tourism for farmers with different poverty return risk modes and levels, continue to dynamically assess the current situation of their return to poverty, and implement the blocking mechanism; give full play to the two major early warning teams and the two major stakeholders, and construct a long-term linkage mechanism to put forward the pre-ventive strategy.
tourism-based villagesrisk of poverty returnprevention strategyrural revitalizationNanping Village of Guangdong Province