电子知识产权2024,Issue(9) :32-43.

洛克"充足条件"的知识产权适用:误读与澄清

The Application of Locke's"Enough and as Good"Proviso in Intellectual Property:Misinterpretation and Clarification

苏泽祺
电子知识产权2024,Issue(9) :32-43.

洛克"充足条件"的知识产权适用:误读与澄清

The Application of Locke's"Enough and as Good"Proviso in Intellectual Property:Misinterpretation and Clarification

苏泽祺1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 中国人民大学法学院
  • 折叠

摘要

现有知识产权理论将充足条件视为财产权限制条件属于一种误读,既不符合洛克的论证原意,也不符合其自由主义的基本立场.在洛克自由主义财产观下,充足条件应当是自然状态的预设,属于洛克劳动财产理论中的先在性条件,构成劳动获得财产权这一命题成立的基本前提,对应于知识产权制度体现为公有领域保留.知识产权的私权属性决定了其同样具有洛克自由主义的价值取向,因此,公有领域的存在并非对知识产权的限制,而是证成知识产权正当性的重要依据.这一解释路径对于探讨人工智能生成物、数据财产权等问题也具有一定的规范意义.

Abstract

The existing theory of intellectual property regards"Enough and as Good"Proviso as restrictive conditions for property rights,which is a misreading and does not conform to Locke's original argument or his basic position of liberalism.Under Locke's liberal property theory,"Enough and as Good"Proviso should be a preset natural state,which belongs to the pre-existing condition in Locke's labor-property theory and constitutes the basic premise for the proposition of labor obtaining property rights.Correspondingly,the intellectual property system is reflected in the preservation of the public domain.The private nature of intellectual property determines that it also has the value orientation of Locke liberalism.Therefore,the existence of the public domain is not a restriction on intellectual property,but an important basis for proving the legitimacy of intellectual property.This explanatory path also has certain normative significance for exploring issues such as AI generated works and data property rights.

关键词

洛克/劳动财产理论/充足条件/知识产权

Key words

Locke/Labor-Property Theory/"Enough and as Good"Proviso/Intellectual Property

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
电子知识产权
工业和信息化部电子科技情报研究所 工业和信息化部电子知识产权中心

电子知识产权

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.465
ISSN:1004-9517
段落导航相关论文