人工智能生成内容著作权问题研究——基于中美案例的比较分析
A Discussion on the Copyright Issue of AI-generated Content——Based on the Comparison Between Cases of China and the US
王勤1
作者信息
摘要
应当给予人工智能生成内容著作权保护.美国基于人工智能生成内容的创作主体为人工智能系统,而否定人工智能生成内容的可版权性并不合理.认为人工智能是创作主体不符合马克思主义哲学对主体和客体二元区分的认知立场,人工智能系统并不具备人类的自我意识、思维与情感.将人工智能生成内容纳入著作权保护的范围符合劳动产生财产权的哲学原理,可以激励人们的劳动投入,有利于相关产业的发展和创新.给予人工智能生成内容著作权保护将会产生一定的司法和行政成本,对于该内容的著作权登记,应持审慎态度,可以否定其可登记性,或者设立一定的登记门槛,以节约版权登记机关的行政成本.
Abstract
AI-generated content shall be given copyright protection.AI software shall not be the creating subject of AIgenerated content.The creation of a work is not always controlled by a person'sfree will,and content that is not controlled by a person's free will may also constitute a work.The idea that artificial intelligence is the subject of creation is not in line with the cognitive position of Marxist philosophy on subject and object.Artificial intelligence systems still cannot have human's self-awareness,mind and emotions.Granting copyright to AIgenerated content is in line with the philosophical principle that labor generates property rights,and can also stimulate people's labor input and facilitate the development and innovation of AI industries.Granting copyright to AI generated content will incur certain judicial and administrative costs,and a prudent attitude should be taken towards the copyright registration of such content,either by denying its registrability or by setting up some kind of registration threshold so that administrative costs of the copyright registry can be saved.
关键词
人工智能生成内容/主体/劳动财产权/激励理论Key words
AI-generated Content/Subject/Labor Generating Property Rights/Motivation Theory引用本文复制引用
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
万方数据