电子知识产权2024,Issue(11) :89-98.

商业数据司法保护实践与规则重构

Judicial Protection Practice and Rule Reconstruction of Commercial Data

周迪 贺文奕
电子知识产权2024,Issue(11) :89-98.

商业数据司法保护实践与规则重构

Judicial Protection Practice and Rule Reconstruction of Commercial Data

周迪 1贺文奕2
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 北京知识产权法院
  • 2. 中国政法大学
  • 折叠

摘要

随着数据资源在现代经济体系中的重要性不断攀升,由数据财产权益引发的争议案件显著增加.当前法律体系中,商业数据保护机制主要依托于著作权法与反不正当竞争法,然而这两种路径均具有局限性,并且在司法实践中未能形成统一的裁判标准.有鉴于此,深入分析并归纳现有司法案例中的裁判逻辑,提炼符合我国国情的裁判经验显得尤为关键,同时也能为后续立法奠定基础.首先,应清晰界定商业数据作为法律保护客体的具体条件,提升识别的准确性和操作性;其次,弱化对数据权益人经营者身份判定的严格程度,以更开阔的视角将其纳入保护范畴;再者,重新评估和界定市场竞争行为的合法性边界,确保裁判规则既能维护市场公平,又能促进数字经济的创新与发展.

Abstract

As the importance of data resources in the modern economic system continues to rise,disputes arising from data property rights have significantly increased.In the current legal system,the protection mechanisms for commercial data mainly rely on copyright law and anti-unfair competition law.However,both paths have limitations and have not formed a unified standard in judicial practice.Against this background,it is crucial to deeply analyze and summarize the adjudication logic in existing judicial cases,extracting adjudication experiences that align with China's national conditions,and laying the foundation for subsequent legislation.Firstly,the specific conditions for commercial data as a legal protection object should be clearly defined to enhance the accuracy and operability of identification.Secondly,the strictness of determining the identity of data rights holders should be weakened,incorporating a broader perspective into the protection scope.Furthermore,the legality boundaries of market competition behaviors should be reassessed and redefined to ensure that adjudication rules not only maintain market fairness but also promote innovation and development in the digital economy.

关键词

数据/商业数据/财产权益/反不正当竞争法

Key words

Data/Commercial Data/Property Rights/Anti-Unfair Competition Law

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
电子知识产权
工业和信息化部电子科技情报研究所 工业和信息化部电子知识产权中心

电子知识产权

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.465
ISSN:1004-9517
段落导航相关论文