欧亚"新中间地带"国家生活中的历史记忆:当代国家建构中的历史注脚
石靖 1王涛2
作者信息
- 1. 清华大学国际与地区研究院;华东师范大学俄罗斯研究中心
- 2. 清华大学国际与地区研究院
- 折叠
摘要
20世纪中期,有关"中间地带"的概念及理论探讨开始成为与时代因素紧密绑定的内容.随着近年来国际局势的快速变化,全球化时代正在遭遇诸多新挑战,国际秩序的变革及相关国际关系中层理论成为政策和学研层面的关注点,其中围绕"新中间地带"的探讨折射出连接历史并反映现实的新内容.在围绕"新中间地带"的讨论范畴内,欧亚地区的小国群体是可以从历史和地理等纬度佐证当前阶段"中间地带"特点的案例.国际秩序深入调整和欧亚地区国家愈加强调"自我"的事实证明,国家的独立自主状态和全方位的认知及话语建构是一项长期性任务.本研究聚焦当代欧亚地区国家特别的转型逻辑和实践,即"中间地带"属性的定位和运筹:通过调动独创性的历史记忆,滋养当代相对薄弱的政治现状,二者的互动及产出是相关国家在国际及地区政治环境中独立性彰显的重要依托.欧亚地域蕴藏有多样的文明形式,国家间的历史和政治进程存在差异,但作为次地区的中亚、高加索是"多元性政治中间地带",并在现当代都存在历史记忆映照现实政治的情形.实证部分以乌兹别克斯坦和格鲁吉亚的案例进行分析,探索和佐证历史记忆之于当代欧亚国家建构的重要作用,增补欧亚"新中间地带"问题现状的历史注脚.
Abstract
In the mid-20th century,the concept and theoretical discussion of the"intermediate zone"began to become closely tied to contemporary factors.With the rapid changes in international affairs in recent years,the era of globalization is encountering many new challenges.The transformation of the international order and related mid-level theories of international relations have become focal points for policy and academic researches.Discussions around the"new intermediate zone"reflect new content that connects history and mirrors current realities.Within the scope of these discussions,the small countries of the Eurasian region serve as cases that can illustrate the characteristics of the"intermediate zone"from historical and geographical dimensions.The deep adjustments in the international order and the increasing emphasis on"self-identity"by countries in the Eurasian region demonstrate that a state's independent status and its comprehensive cognition and discourse construction are long-term tasks.This study focuses on the unique transformation logic and practices of contemporary Eurasian countries,specifically the positioning and maneuvering of the"intermediate zone"attributes.By mobilizing original historical memories to nourish the relatively weak contemporary political situation,the interaction and outcomes of these two aspects are crucial supports for these countries to assert their independence in the international and regional political landscape.The Eurasian region is rich in diverse forms of civilization,and there are differences in the historical and political processes among countries.However,Central Asia and the Caucasus,as subregions,are"pluralistic political intermediate zones"and both have historical memories that reflect current political realities.The empirical section analyzes the cases of Uzbekistan and Georgia,exploring and demonstrating the important role of historical memory in the construction of contemporary Eurasian countries,and providing historical annotations on the current state of the"new intermediate zone"in Eurasia.
关键词
"新中间地带"/历史记忆/欧亚国家建构/欧亚国家转型Key words
"New Intermediate Zone"/Historical Memory/Construction of Eurasian States/Transformation of Eurasian States引用本文复制引用
基金项目
国家社会科学基金青年项目(22CGJ034)
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
万方数据