催收非法债务罪"催收"行为的类型化认定
Typological Identification of the Behavior of"Debt Collection"in the Crime of Illegal Debt Collection
王俊 1席远方1
作者信息
摘要
刑法理论应当以法益为基础,对催收非法债务罪核心语词"催收"概念的内涵外延进行类型化解读.催收非法债务罪中暴力胁迫型、限制自由型和软暴力型"催收"行为的实质在于对被害人产生物理或者心理上的强制.暴力胁迫型"催收"行为中的"暴力"应当采广义的暴力,"胁迫"包括以暴力或非暴力相威胁,无须达到压制被害人反抗的程度;限制自由型"催收"行为可以参考非法侵入住宅罪和非法拘禁罪的认定标准;软暴力型"催收"行为应当造成被害人的恐惧进而形成心理强制,相较于暴力胁迫型"催收"行为缺乏现实、紧迫的危险.
Abstract
Criminal law theory should be based on the legal interests and a typological interpretation of the connotations and extensions of the concept of"collection",which is the core term of the crime of illegal debt collection.The essence of the violent coercion,infringement of freedom and soft violence types of the crime of collecting illegal debts is to make the victim physically or psychologically coerced."Violence"in the context of the violent coercion type of debt collection should be defined as violence in its broad sense,and"coercion"includes the threat of violence or non-violence,which need not be to the extent of suppressing the victim's resistance.The infringement of freedom type of debt collection can refer to the standards of both crime of illegally intruding into others'residences and the crime of unlawfully detaining others.the soft violence type of debt collection should cause the victim's fear to form a psychological coercion,which lacks real and imminent danger compared with the violent coercion type of debt collection.
关键词
催收非法债务罪/暴力胁迫型/限制自由型/软暴力型Key words
crime of illegal debt collection/the violent coercion type/the infringement of freedom type/the soft violence type引用本文复制引用
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
万方数据