福建江夏学院学报2024,Vol.14Issue(1) :67-82.

通过个案建构规则——基于美国行政裁决个案的研究

Constructing Rules Through Individual Cases:An Investigation Centered on American Administrative Adjudication

阳李
福建江夏学院学报2024,Vol.14Issue(1) :67-82.

通过个案建构规则——基于美国行政裁决个案的研究

Constructing Rules Through Individual Cases:An Investigation Centered on American Administrative Adjudication

阳李1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 成都中医药大学马克思主义学院,四川成都,610037
  • 折叠

摘要

行政裁决是美国行政机构的有效治理利器.行政机构可以通过裁决形成政策风向标.在规制实践中,行政机构时常通过某些具体裁决作为公布特定政策的工具.个案裁决的政策适用范围有限,不产生普遍约束力和广泛适用性;但成为制定宽泛政策的风向标,对其他已决个案或未发生的类似个案提供柔性指引.行政机构可以通过个案裁决建构规则体系.行政机构的裁决决定对法律或司法判例之约束进行一定程度的修正,部分裁决甚至会突破法律或司法判例的强制性规定,并在一定程度上形成具有普遍约束力和广泛适用性的规则.行政机构之所以可以通过个案裁决建构规则体系,原因在于行政机构具有某些"固有权威",这些"固有权威"由官方知识、实践知识与经验、法律背景或立法性事实等构成.

Abstract

Administrative adjudication is an effective governance tool for U.S.administrative agencies,which can shape policies through adjudication.In regulatory practice,administrative agencies often use certain ad-judications as tools to publish certain policies that have limited application scope and do not produce univer-sal binding force and broad applicability,but may provide guidance for other outstanding cases or similar cases that have not occurred.In addition to the unbiased enforcement of the law,the adjudication may amend the law or judicial precedents to a certain extent,or even break through its mandatory provisions,and form rules with universal binding and broad applicability to a certain extent.Official knowledge,practical knowl-edge and experience,legal background or legislative facts,etc.may all be used as theoretical basis and be-come the"inherent authority"for administrative agencies to formulate rules through adjudication.

关键词

美国/行政裁决/政策/规则/固有权威

Key words

the United States/adjudication/policy/rules/inherent authority

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
福建江夏学院学报
福建江夏学院

福建江夏学院学报

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.179
ISSN:2095-2082
参考文献量92
段落导航相关论文