There is no unified international standard for determining climate change litigation. Different organi-zations and regions have their own localized standards,which are mainly based on three aspects:litigation mo-tives,case issues,and case impact. The first series of "Carbon Peaking and Carbon Neutrality"typical cases re-leased by the Supreme People's Court embodies the localization of climate change litigation in China's judicial context,revealing that there may be two types of climate change litigation in China. One is in the context of liti-gation development,which is defined according to case issues. The other is in the context of judicial specializa-tion,which is defined according to case impact. The former manifests itself in the systematization of climate change litigation,while the latter may give rise to special jurisdictional rules. The two types of climate change litigation have possibility and necessity to coexist,and together constitute China's solution to climate change liti-gation.
关键词
气候变化诉讼/认定标准/"双碳"目标/环境资源审判
Key words
climate change litigation/criteria for recognition/Carbon Peaking and Carbon Neutrality/environment and resources adjudication
维普
万方数据