首页|界面处理方式对CFRP-ECC复合加固混凝土梁受弯性能影响研究

界面处理方式对CFRP-ECC复合加固混凝土梁受弯性能影响研究

扫码查看
探究界面处理方式对CFRP-ECC复合加固混凝土梁受弯性能的影响,通过四点弯曲试验,分析试验梁破坏形态、荷载-挠度曲线、延性系数等指标的变化规律,确定CFRP-ECC复合加固混凝土梁承载力计算公式.结果表明:相较于自然面,采用凿毛或界面剂处理,改变了试验梁的破坏形态,使CFRP-ECC复合加固层由剥离破坏转化为拉断破坏;与RC梁相比,采用自然面处理时,试件的极限承载力仅增大8.7%~12.1%,延性系数仅增大2.5%~7.3%,而采用凿毛或界面剂处理时,极限承载力增大34.9%~44.1%,延性系数增大15.2%~19.0%.所提公式可为CFRP-ECC 复合加固混凝土梁设计计算提供理论参考,其计算值与试验值最大误差仅为6.7%.
Research on the Influence ofInterface Treatment Methods on the Bending Performance of CFRP-ECC Composite Reinforced Concrete Beams
To investigate the influence of interface treatment methods on the flexural performance of CFRP-ECC composite reinforced con-crete beams,the change patterns of experimental beam failure modes,load deflection curves,ductility coefficients,and other indicators were analyzed through four point bending tests,and the calculation formula for the bearing capacity of CFRP-ECC composite reinforced concrete beams was determined.The results showed that compared to the natural surface,the use of chiseling or interface agent treatment changed the failure mode of the test beam,causing the CFRP-ECC composite reinforcement layer to transform from peeling failure to tensile fail-ure.Compared with RC beams,when using natural surface treatment,the ultimate bearing capacity and ductility coefficient of the specimens only increase by 8.7%~12.1%and 2.5%~7.3%,respectively.However,when using chiseling or interface agent treatment,the ultimate bearing capacity increases by 34.9%~44.1%,and the ductility coefficient increases by 15.2%~19.0%.The proposed formula can pro-vide theoretical reference for the design and calculation of CFRP-ECC composite reinforced concrete beams,with a maximum error of only 6.7%between the calculated and experimental values.

CFRPECCFlexural performanceInterface treatment methodCalculation formula for bearing capacity

叶华勇

展开 >

南安市建设工程质量与安全工作站 福建泉州 362300

CFRP ECC 受弯性能 界面处理方式 承载力计算公式

2024

福建建筑
福建省土木建筑学会

福建建筑

影响因子:0.379
ISSN:1004-6135
年,卷(期):2024.(11)