首页|肌内效贴联合Vitalstim电刺激疗法对脑卒中后吞咽障碍疗效观察

肌内效贴联合Vitalstim电刺激疗法对脑卒中后吞咽障碍疗效观察

扫码查看
目的 观察肌内效贴联合Vitalstim电刺激疗法对脑卒中后吞咽障碍的疗效.方法 选择2021年1月—2023年1月于湖南中医药大学第一附属医院针灸推拿康复科、神经外科收治的脑卒中后吞咽障碍患者90例作为研究对象,采用随机数字表法分为肌内效贴组、Vitalstim电刺激组和联合组,每组30例.3组在常规吞咽康复治疗基础上(包括吞咽训练、冰刺激,每日1次,每次20 min,10次为1个疗程,共治疗2个疗程),分别给予肌内效贴治疗(每日1次,每次至少12 h,10次为1个疗程,共治疗2个疗程)、Vitalstim电刺激疗法(每日1次,每次20 min,10次为1个疗程,共治疗2个疗程)以及二者联用.治疗后对比3组临床总有效率、误吸发生率、标准吞咽功能评定量表(SSA)、洼田饮水试验(WST)、功能性经口摄食评价量表(FOIS)及营养状况指标.结果 3组治疗后WST评级结果较治疗前明显改善(P<0.05);联合组均较Vitalstim电刺激组和肌内效贴组更为明显(P<0.05);Vitalstim电刺激组和肌内效贴组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).总有效率比较,联合组较肌内效贴组、Vitalstim电刺激组均提高(P<0.05);Vitalstim电刺激组和肌内效贴组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).误吸发生率比较,联合组较肌内效贴组和Vitalstim电刺激组均降低(P<0.05);Vital-stim电刺激组与肌内效贴组比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).3组治疗后SSA评分均有所降低(P<0.05);其中联合组较Vitalstim电刺激组和肌内效贴组均更为明显(P<0.05);Vitalstim电刺激组较肌内效贴组SSA评分降低更加明显(P<0.05).3组治疗后FOIS评分均升高(P<0.05);其中联合组均较Vitalstim电刺激组和肌内效贴组更明显(P<0.05);Vitalstim电刺激组和肌内效贴组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).营养指标比较,3组治疗后BMI、ALB、Hb指标均提高(P<0.05);其中联合组较Vitalstim电刺激组和肌内效贴组更为明显(P<0.05);Vitalstim电刺激组和肌内效贴组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 肌内效贴联合Vitalstim电刺激疗法应用于脑卒中后吞咽功能障碍能够显著提升疗效,降低误吸发生率,从而提高进食安全性,改善吞咽功能以及不良营养状态.
Efficacy of Kinesio Taping Combined with Vitalstim Electrical Stimulation Therapy in Patients with Post-Stroke Dysphagia
Objective To observe the efficacy of kinesio taping combined with Vitalstim electrical stimulation therapy in pa-tients with post-stroke dysphagia.Methods A total of 90 patients with post-stroke dysphagia treated in the Department of Acupunc-ture,Tuina and Rehabilitation and Neurosurgery Department of the First Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine from January 2021 to January 2023 were selected as the study subjects.They were randomly divided into kinesio tape group,Vitalstim electrical stimulation group,and combined group,with 30 cases in each group.All three groups received conventional swallowing rehabilitation treatment(including swallowing training,ice stimulation,1 time per day,20 minutes each time,10 times for 1 course of treatment,and a total of 2 courses of treatment).In addition,the kinesio tape group was treated with kinesio taping therapy(1 time per day and kept for at least 12 hours,10 sessions for 1 course of treatment,and a total of 2 courses of treatment),the Vitalstim elec-trical stimulation group received Vitalstim electrical stimulation therapy(1 time per day,20 minutes each time,10 times for a course of treatment,and a total of 2 courses of treatment)and the combined group was treated with the combination of the two.After treat-ment,the three groups were compared in terms of clinical efficacy,incidence of aspiration,standardized swallowing assessment(SSA),water swallowing test(WST),functional oral intake scale(FOIS),and indicators of nutritional status.Results The water swallowing test ratings of all three groups after treatment improved significantly compared with those before treatment(P<0.05),with the combined group showing a more pronounced improvement than those of the Vitalstim electrical stimulation group and the kinesio tape group(P<0.05),while there was no significant difference between the Vitalstim electrical stimulation group and the ki-nesio tape group(P>0.05).In terms of total effective rate,the combined group was significantly higher than that of the kinesio tape group and the Vitalstim electrical stimulation group(P<0.05),and there was no significant difference between the Vitalstim electri-cal stimulation group and the kinesio tape group(P>0.05).In comparison of the incidence of aspiration,the combined group showed significantly lower aspiration incidence than the kinesio tape group and the Vitalstim electrical stimulation group(P<0.05),and there was no statistical difference in the aspiration incidence between the Vitalstim electrical stimulation group and the kinesio tape group(P>0.05).SSA scores were reduced in all three groups after treatment(P<0.05),with the combined group showing a more pro-nounced reduction than the Vitalstim electrical stimulation group and the kinesio tape group(P<0.05),and the reduction of SSA scores in the Vitalstim electrical stimulation group being more pronounced than the kinesio tape group(P<0.05).FOIS scores in-creased in all three groups after treatment(P<0.05),with the increase of the combined group being more pronounced than the Vitals-tim electrical stimulation group and the kinesio tape group(P<0.05),and there was no significant difference between the Vitalstim electrical stimulation group and the kinesio tape group(P>0.05).Comparison of nutritional indicators showed that BMI,ALB,and Hb indexes increased in all three groups after treatment(P<0.05),with the increase in the combined group being more pronounced than the Vitalstim electrical stimulation group and the kinesio tape group(P<0.05),and no significant difference between the Vitals-tim electrical stimulation group and the the kinesio tape group(P>0.05).Conclusion The application of kinesio taping combined with Vitalstim electrical stimulation therapy in patients with post-stroke swallowing dysfunction can significantly improve therapeu-tic efficacy,reduce the incidence of aspiration,improve feeding safety,and improve swallowing function as well as nutritional status.

strokedysphagiakinesio tapeVitalstim electrical stimulation therapyaspirationnutritional status

付珊珊、唐健

展开 >

湖南中医药大学第一附属医院,湖南 长沙 410007

脑卒中 吞咽障碍 肌内效贴 Vitalstim电刺激疗法 误吸 营养状态

2024

康复学报
福建中医药大学

康复学报

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.545
ISSN:2096-0328
年,卷(期):2024.34(5)