The specificity of cyberbullying poses challenges to the effectiveness of existing legal governance frame-works.Both the traditional individual judicial relief model and the regulatory model of"information content"by the internet information office are insufficient in effectively preventing and controlling cyberbullying.Currently,platform technological governance has emerged as a primary solution mandated by relevant legislation.Technological governance enables early warning of cyberbullying and the accurate identification of information.Platforms,acting as"gatekeepers",play a crucial role in controlling violent information on the internet due to their monopolistic position in data,making technological solu-tions against cyberbullying feasible.Legislative requirements for technological governance solutions include establishing models for identifying cyberbullying,implementing user protection mechanisms,and enabling information blocking.Among these requirements,developing an effective model for identifying different types of online violence is paramount;this in-cludes models for both content analysis and identification of high-risk accounts.Additionally,exploring the use of social robots can generate positive counteractive information against abusive content.However,it is important not to overlook po-tential risks associated with technology-based measures against online violence.To identify"armful information"cyberbul-lying,it is imperative to incorporate elements such as individual perceptions,interpersonal relationships,and contextual factors into recognition models.Addressing the risks to user rights on platforms requires"technological due process"and the principle of proportionality to safeguard users'rights to notification,informed consent,algorithmic transparency,and to limit platform power.To mitigate security risks associated with social bots,it is essential to consider the legitimacy of cy-berbullying governance scenarios,reinforce value guidance,ensure content reliability,and control the boundaries of infor-mation dissemination.Furthermore,it is crucial to clarify the scope of duty bearers,with the responsibility for cyberbully-ing governance being shouldered by large and super-large digital platforms.
cyberbullyingplatform governancegroup polarizationtechnological due processsocial robots
万方数据
维普
