At present,the key point of determining repeated action in the third-party revocation action lies in the i-dentification of the relationship between the third-party revocation action and the action for confirmation of related rights.From the perspective of the characteristics of the third-party revocation action,in fact,it is an action brought by the third-party to cancel the effectiveness of the effective judgment between the parties based on the substantive rights enjoyed by the third-party.There is a natural connection between the third-party revocation action and the action for confirmation of related rights,and the two are the repeated actions in essence.It is just that the order in which they were brought is differ-ent,so there are two kinds of repeated action in narrow sense and repeated actions in broad sense.When the third-party first brings the third-party revocation action,and then brings the action for confirmation of related rights in the process of the third-party revocation action or after losing the action,the successive actions are the repeated action in narrow sense,and it is necessary to reconstruct the theory of the litigious object to regulate the repeated action;when the third-party first brings the action for confirmation of related rights,and then brings the third-party revocation action in the process of the action for confirmation of related rights or after losing the action,the successive actions are the repeated action in broad sense,and we should adopt the theory of issue preclusion to and the theory of compulsory combination of actions to regulate the repeated action.
the third-party revocation actionaction for confirmation of related rightsrepeated action in narrow senserepeated action in broad sensethe path to identify repeated action
万方数据
维普
