The two paragraphs of Article 49 of the Judicial Interpretation of the General Principles of Contracts differ in their official characterization,with paragraph 1 characterized as"apparent assignment of claims"and paragraph 2 as"con-firmation of the existence of a claim by the debtor",which is neither uniform nor coordinated.The characterization of para-graph 1 is a general statement,and there is no disagreement;the provisions of paragraph 2 are a concrete expression of ob-jective facts,lacking in generality,and should be characterized as a liability for the appearance of claims,so as to establish a unified system of rules for the appearance of claims.The rule of appearance of claim assignment refers to the rule of claim assignment in which the assignor gives false notice or the debtor gives false acknowledgement to form the appearance of ef-fectiveness of claim assignment or existence of claim,so that the debtor or the assignee obtains a reasonable reliance on the claim.This appearance rule includes both apparent assignment of claims and apparent liability for claims,both of which have the effect of enforcing the validity of apparent assignments of claims and protecting the reliance interests of the debtor and the assignee of the assignment of claims respectively for the purpose of maintaining order in transactions.
assignment of claimsapparent assignment of claimsapparent liability for claimsmandatory validityprotection of reliance interests
万方数据
维普
