首页|TROPIS改良挂线法和传统切开挂线术治疗高位肛瘘的临床效果及安全性比较

TROPIS改良挂线法和传统切开挂线术治疗高位肛瘘的临床效果及安全性比较

扫码查看
目的 探讨经肛括约肌间切开(TROPIS)改良挂线法与传统切口挂线术治疗高位肛瘘的临床效果.方法 选取我院 2021 年5 月—2023 年5 月收治的 72例高位肛瘘患者为研究对象,按随机数字表法将其分为对照组与观察组,各 36 例.对照组采用传统切开挂线术治疗,观察组采用TROPIS改良挂线法治疗.比较两组患者的手术情况、术后恢复情况、疼痛评分、肛门功能及并发症发生情况.结果 观察组手术时间、住院时间分别为(62.52±6.13)min、(8.52±1.13)d,均短于对照组,术中出血量为(80.41±6.32)mL,少于对照组,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).观察组便血、脓腐脱落及创面愈合时间分别为(5.12±1.02)d、(4.08±0.46)d、(25.63±2.38)d,均短于对照组,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).术后 1、3、7 d时,观察组疼痛视觉模拟评分分别为(3.96±0.45)分、(2.81±0.38)分、(1.81±0.24)分,均低于对照组,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).术后3个月,观察组耻骨直肠肌、内括约肌MUP平均时限分别为(6.95±1.05)ms、(7.57±1.12)ms,均长于对照组,肛管静息压、最大收缩压分别为(45.11±4.15)mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)、(176.52±11.33)mmHg,均高于对照组,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).观察组并发症发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 TROPIS改良挂线法治疗高位肛瘘效果更佳,可减轻手术创伤,降低术后疼痛评分,保护肛门功能,且并发症少.
Comparison of Clinical Efficacy and Safety Between TROPIS Modified Suture Method and Traditional Incision Suture Method in the Treatment of High Position Anal Fistula
Objective To investigate the clinical effect of modified transanal opening of intersphincteric space(TROPIS)and traditional incision and thread hanging surgery in the treatment of high position anal fistula.Methods 72 patients with high position anal fistula admitted to our hospital from May 2021 to May 2023 were selected as the research objects,and were divided into a control group and an observation group according to random number table method,with 36 cases in each group.The control group was treated with traditional incision and thread hanging surgery and the observation group was treated with TROPIS modified suture method.The operation status,postoperative recovery,pain score,anal function and complications were compared between the two groups.Results The operation time and hospital stay of the observation group were(62.52±6.13)min and(8.52±1.13)d,respectively,which were shorter than those of the control group,and the intraoperative blood loss was(80.41±6.32)mL,which was lower than that of the control group,with statistical significance(P<0.05).The time of hematochezia,pus shedding and wound healing in the observation group were(5.12±1.02)d,(4.08±0.46)d and(25.63±2.38)d,respectively,which were shorter than those in the control group,and the differences between groups were statistically significant(P<0.05).On 1,3 and 7 adys after surgery,the Visual Analogue Scores of the observation group were(3.96±0.45)points,(2.81±0.38)points and(1.81±0.24)points,respectively,which were lower than those of the control group,and the differences between the groups were statistically significant(P<0.05).3 months after surgery,the average duration of MUP of puborectum muscle and internal sphincter muscle in the observation group was(6.95±1.05)ms and(7.57±1.12)ms,respectively,which were both longer than those in the control group.Anal canal resting pressure and maximum systolic pressure were(45.11±4.15)mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)and(176.52±11.33)mmHg,respectively,higher than those in the control group,and the differences between groups were statistically significant(P<0.05).The incidence of complications in the observation group was lower than that in the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion TROPIS is more effective in the treatment of high position anal fistula,which can reduce surgical trauma,reduce postoperative pain score,protect anal function and reduce complications.

High position anal fistulaTROPIS modified suture methodTraditional incision and thread hanging surgeryPainComplications

王爱华

展开 >

青岛市黄岛区中心医院(西海岸新区中心医院)消化中心肛肠外科,山东青岛 266555

高位肛瘘 TROPIS改良挂线法 传统切开挂线术 疼痛 并发症

2024

反射疗法与康复医学

反射疗法与康复医学

ISSN:
年,卷(期):2024.5(5)
  • 10