首页|介入栓塞术与显微外科夹闭术治疗颅内动脉瘤破裂效果及对患者预后的影响比较

介入栓塞术与显微外科夹闭术治疗颅内动脉瘤破裂效果及对患者预后的影响比较

扫码查看
目的 探讨介入栓塞术与显微外科夹闭术在颅内动脉瘤(IA)破裂中的应用效果.方法 选取我院 2021 年5 月—2023 年5 月收治的 82 例IA破裂患者为研究对象,按随机数字表法将其分为对照组与观察组,各41 例.对照组采用显微外科夹闭术治疗,观察组采用介入栓塞术治疗,比较两组的手术情况、预后效果、改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分、Barthel指数(BI)评分、生活质量及并发症.结果 观察组手术、住院时间分别为(132.41±15.36)min、(12.14±1.24)d,均短于对照组的(150.14±17.57)min、(16.82±1.35)d,术中出血量为(32.05±3.52)mL,少于对照组的(102.41±10.35)mL,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组优良率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组术后mRS评分为(1.65±0.21)分,低于对照组的(2.07±0.25)分,BI评分为(87.54±5.38)分,高于对照组的(80.34±5.22)分,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组术后生活质量各领域评分均高于对照组,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组并发症发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 介入栓塞术治疗IA破裂的效果更佳,可减轻机体创伤,提高患者日常生活能力,改善术后生活质量,安全可靠.
Comparison of the Effect of Interventional Embolization and Microsurgical Clipping in the Treatment of Rupture of Intracranial Aneurysms and Its Influence on the Prognosis of Patients
Objective To investigate the effect of interventional embolization and microsurgical clipping in rupture of intracranial aneurysm(IA).Methods 82 patients with IA rupture admitted to our hospital from May 2021 to May 2023 were selected as research objects,and were divided into a control group and an observation group according to random number table method,with 41 cases in each group.The control group was treated with microsurgical clipping,and the observation group was treated with interventional embolization.The operation status,prognosis,modified Rankin Scale(mRS)score,Barthel Index(BI)score,quality of life and complications were compared between the two groups.Results The duration of operation and hospitalization in the observation group were(132.41±15.36)min and(12.14±1.24)d,respectively,which were shorter than(150.14±17.57)min and(16.82±1.35)d in the control group,the intraoperative blood loss was(32.05±3.52)mL,it was less than(102.41±10.35)mL in control group,and the differences between groups were statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the excellent and good rate between the two groups(P>0.05).The mRS Score of the observation group was(1.65±0.21)points,lower than(2.07±0.25)points of the control group,and the BI score was(87.54±5.38)points,higher than(80.34±5.22)points of the control group,the differences between groups were statistically significant(P<0.05).The scores of World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF in the observation group were higher than those in the control group,and the differences between groups were statistically significant(P<0.05).The incidence of complications in the observation group was lower than that in the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Interventional embolization is more effective in the treatment of IA rupture,which can reduce the body trauma,improve the patients'daily living ability,improve the postoperative quality of life,and is safe and reliable.

Rupture of intracranial aneurysmInterventional embolizationMicrosurgical clippingComplication

卢璐祥、马洪鑫、戚贵军

展开 >

滕州市中心人民医院神经外科,山东滕州 277500

颅内动脉瘤破裂 介入栓塞术 显微外科夹闭术 并发症

2024

反射疗法与康复医学

反射疗法与康复医学

ISSN:
年,卷(期):2024.5(6)
  • 10