首页|单侧双通道脊柱内镜单侧入路双侧减压术与传统椎板切除减压术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效比较

单侧双通道脊柱内镜单侧入路双侧减压术与传统椎板切除减压术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效比较

扫码查看
目的 比较单侧双通道脊柱内镜(UBE)单侧入路双侧减压术与传统椎板切除减压术治疗腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)的临床效果.方法 系统性回顾2021年3月—2023年3月我院收治的60例LSS患者的临床资料,根据手术方式将其分为对照组和研究组.对照组(n=29)实施传统椎板切除减压术,研究组(n=31)实施UBE单侧入路双侧减压术.比较两组的围术期指标、腰腿疼痛程度、腰椎功能.结果 两组手术时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);研究组术中出血量、引流量均少于对照组,切口长度、停引流时间、住院时间均短于对照组,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).术后1 d、1周、1个月,两组VAS评分均低于术前,且研究组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).术后3个月,两组ODI评分均低于术前,且研究组低于对照组,两组JOA评分均高于术前,且研究组高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 两种术式均具有较好的临床治疗效果,但与传统椎板切除减压术相比,UBE应用于LSS治疗中可进一步改善围术期指标,减轻术后疼痛,促进腰椎功能恢复,具有明显的微创优势.
Comparison of Clinical Efficacy Between Unilateral Bilateral Endoscopy Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression and Traditional Laminectomy Decompression for the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of unilateral bilateral endoscopy (UBE) unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression with traditional laminectomy decompression treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).Methods The clinical data of 60 patients with LSS admitted to our hospital from March 2021 to March 2023 were systematically reviewed, and they were divided into a control group and a research group according to different surgical methods.The control group (n=29) underwent traditional laminectomy decompression, the research group (n=31) underwent UBE unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression.The perioperative indicators, degree of lower back and leg pain, and lumbar spine function in both groups were compared.Results There was no significant difference in operation time between the two groups (P>0.05);the intraoperative bleeding and drainage volume in the research group were less than those in the control group, and the incision length, stop drainage time and hospital stay were all shorter than those in the control group, the differences between the groups were statistically significant (P<0.05).3 months after surgery, the ODI scores of both groups were lower than before surgery, and the research group was lower than the control group, the JOA scores of both groups were higher than before surgery, and the research group was higher than the control group, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).Conclusion Both surgical methods have good clinical therapeutic effects, but compared with traditional laminectomy decompression, UBE applied in LSS treatment can further improve perioperative indicators, reduce postoperative pain, promote lumbar functional recovery, and have obvious minimally invasive advantages.

Lumbar spinal stenosisUnilateral biportal endoscopyUnilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompressionTraditional laminectomy decompressionLumbar spine function

于西锋

展开 >

日照颈腰椎病医院外科,山东日照 276800

腰椎管狭窄症 单侧双通道脊柱内镜 单侧入路双侧减压术 传统椎板切除减压术 腰椎功能

2024

反射疗法与康复医学

反射疗法与康复医学

ISSN:
年,卷(期):2024.5(15)
  • 5