首页|神经内镜辅助下血肿清除术治疗基底节区脑出血患者的影响

神经内镜辅助下血肿清除术治疗基底节区脑出血患者的影响

扫码查看
目的 探讨神经内镜辅助下血肿清除术治疗基底节区脑出血的临床效果.方法 选取2020年1月—2022年12月临清市人民医院收治的 104 例基底节区脑出血患者为研究对象,按随机数字表法将其分为对照组及观察组,每组52例.对照组行小骨窗血肿清除术,观察组行神经内镜辅助下血肿清除术.比较两组患者的手术情况、神经功能、预后情况、应激反应、生活质量及并发症发生情况.结果 观察组的手术时间为(125.63±11.47)min,短于对照组的(152.44±15.63)min,术中出血量为(85.63±6.74)mL,少于对照组的(132.41±12.57)mL,血肿清除率为(90.33±4.32)%,高于对照组的(82.52±5.14)%,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).术后 3 个月,观察组的美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分低于对照组,格拉斯哥预后量表评分高于对照组,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组去甲肾上腺素、皮质醇、促肾上腺皮质激素水平均低于对照组,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组世界卫生组织生活质量评定量表简表中各领域评分均高于对照组,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).观察组并发症发生率为 3.85%,低于对照组的 15.38%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 采用神经内镜辅助下血肿清除术治疗基底节区脑出血的效果更佳,可减轻手术创伤,加快血肿清除,改善患者神经功能及预后,且并发症少.
Effect of Neuroendoscopic Assisted Hematoma Removal Surgery in Patients with Cerebral Hemorrhage in Basal Ganglia
Objective To investigate the clinical effect of neuroendoscopic assisted of hematoma removal surgery on patient with cerebral hemorrhage in basal ganglia.Methods A total of 104 patients with cerebral hemorrhage in basal ganglia admitted to Linqing People's Hospital from January 2020 to December 2022 were selected as the study objects and were divided into a control group and an observation group according to random number table method,with 52 cases in each group.The control group underwent small bone window hematoma removal,and the observation group underwent neuroendoscopic assisted hematoma removal.The operation status,neurological function,prognosis,stress response,quality of life and complications were compared between the two groups.Results The operative time of the observation group was(125.63±11.47)min,which was shorter than(152.44±15.63)min of the control group,the intraoperative blood loss was(85.63±6.74)mL,which was less than(132.41±12.57)mL of the control group,the clearance rate of hematoma was(90.33±4.32)%,which was higher than(82.52±5.14)%of the control group,the differences between the groups were statistically significant(P<0.05).After 3 months of surgery,the score of the National Institute of Health stroke scale in the observation group was lower than that of the control group,and the score of the Glasgow Outcome Scale was higher than that of the control group,the differences between the groups were statistically significant(P<0.05);the levels of norepinephrine,cortisol and adrenocorticotropic hormone in the observation group were lower than those in the control group,the differences between the groups were statistically significant(P<0.05);the scores in all fields of the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF scale in the observation group were higher than those in the control group,the differences between the groups were statistically significant(P<0.05).The incidence of complications in the observation group was 3.85%,which was lower than 15.38%in the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Neuroendoscopic assisted hematoma removal surgery is more effective in the treatment of cerebral hemorrhage in basal ganglia,which can reduce surgical trauma,accelerate the removal of hematoma,improve the neurological function and prognosis of patients with fewer complications.

Cerebral hemorrhage in basal gangliaNeuroendoscopyHematoma removal surgeryComplicationsPrognosis

韩士军

展开 >

临清市人民医院神经外科,山东聊城 252600

基底节区脑出血 神经内镜 血肿清除术 并发症 预后

2024

反射疗法与康复医学

反射疗法与康复医学

ISSN:
年,卷(期):2024.5(16)