放射学实践2024,Vol.39Issue(2) :189-194.DOI:10.13609/j.cnki.1000-0313.2024.02.008

T1-mapping鉴别腮腺常见肿瘤的初探

The preliminary study of native T1-mapping in differentiating common parotid gland tumors

文宝红 张赞霞 朱靖 付坤 张勇 程敬亮
放射学实践2024,Vol.39Issue(2) :189-194.DOI:10.13609/j.cnki.1000-0313.2024.02.008

T1-mapping鉴别腮腺常见肿瘤的初探

The preliminary study of native T1-mapping in differentiating common parotid gland tumors

文宝红 1张赞霞 1朱靖 1付坤 2张勇 1程敬亮1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 450052 河南郑州,郑州大学第一附属医院磁共振科
  • 2. 450052 河南郑州,郑州大学第一附属医院口腔颌面外科
  • 折叠

摘要

目的:探讨T1-mapping和分段读出DWI(RESOLVE-DWI)在腮腺常见肿瘤鉴别诊断中的价值.方法:回顾性分析2018年6月-2022年8月经病理证实的169例腮腺常见肿瘤患者的T1-mapping及分段读出DWI资料.其中,多形性腺瘤85例,Warthin瘤32例,恶性肿瘤52例.测量并比较三组肿瘤的T1及ADC值,运用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评价T,、ADC及二者联合(T1+ADC)对腮腺肿瘤的鉴别诊断价值.采用Delong检验比较各参数的AUC的差异.结果:三组肿瘤的T1值和ADC值的差异均有统计学意义(P<0.001);组间两两比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.001);多形性腺瘤的T1值及ADC值最高;恶性肿瘤次之,Warthin瘤最低.T1 和ADC鉴别多形性腺瘤与War-thin 瘤、多形性腺瘤与恶性肿瘤、Warthin瘤与恶性肿瘤的AUC分别为0.914和0.997、0.664和0.869、0.835和0.695,Delong检验显示2个参数AUC的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).T1+ADC鉴别多形性腺瘤与 Warthin瘤、多形性腺瘤与恶性肿瘤的AUC均显著高于T1(1.000 vs.0.914、0.873 vs.0.664,P 均<0.001);T1+ADC 鉴别 Warthin 瘤与恶性肿瘤的 AUC 显著高于 T1(0.895 vs.0.835,P<0.001)和 ADC(0.895 vs.0.695,P<0.001).结论:T1-mapping 和 RESOLVE-DWI 有助于鉴别诊断腮腺常见肿瘤,二者联合诊断可提高鉴别诊断效能.

Abstract

Objective:This study was aimed to investigate the value of native T1-mapping and readout segmentation of long variable echo-trains diffusion weighted imaging(RESOLVE-DWI)in differentiating parotid gland tumors.Methods:169 patients with parotid gland tumors who underwent native T1-mapping and RESOLVE-DWI confirmed by pathology from June 2018 to August 2022 were retrospectively analyzed,including 85 patients with pleomorphic adenomas(PAs),32 patients with Warthin tumors(WTs),and 52 patients with malignant parotid gland tumors(MPGTs).The mean T1 and apparent diffusion coefficient(ADC)values of the lesions between groups were calculated and analyzed.Receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve analysis was conducted and the area under the curve(AUC)was calculated to evaluate the diagnostic performance of T1-value,ADC value,and the combination of them(T1+ADC).The differences in AUCs between T,and ADC was analyzed using Delong test.Results:Overall,there were significant differences in T1 and ADC values among three groups(all P<0.001),pairwise comparison showed that T1 and ADC values were statistically signifi-cant(all P<0.001).PA exhibited the highest T,and ADC values,followed by MT,WT was the lowest.The AUC of T1 and ADC in differentiating PA and WT,PA and MT,WT and MT were 0.914 and 0.997,0.664 and 0.869,0.835 and 0.695,respectively.Delong test showed that there were no signi-ficant differences in AUCs between T1 and ADC(all P>0.05).The AUC of T1+ADC in differentia-ting PA and WT,and PA and MT was higher than that of T1-value(1.000 vs.0.914 and 0.873 vs.0.664,both P<0.001).The AUC of T1+ADC in differentiating WT and MT was higher than that of T1(0.895 vs.0.835,P<0.001)and ADC(0.895 vs.0.695,P<0.001).Conclusion:Both native T1-map-ping and RESOLVE-DWI all can be used to quantitatively differential diagnosis common parotid gland tumors.Combination of the two methods can further improve the diagnostic efficiency.

关键词

腮腺肿瘤/磁共振成像/T1-mapping/弥散加权成像

Key words

Parotid gland tumor/Magnetic resonance imaging/T1-mapping/Diffusion weigh-ted imaging

引用本文复制引用

基金项目

河南省医学科技攻关计划联合共建项目(LHGJ20190157)

出版年

2024
放射学实践
华中科技大学同济医学院

放射学实践

CSTPCDCSCD北大核心
影响因子:1.08
ISSN:1000-0313
参考文献量18
段落导航相关论文