放射学实践2024,Vol.39Issue(2) :213-217.DOI:10.13609/j.cnki.1000-0313.2024.02.012

2型糖尿病Gd-EOB-DTPA增强MRI肝肾影像改变

Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MRI of liver and kidney in type 2 diabetes

孙昊洋 张文玉 张文龙
放射学实践2024,Vol.39Issue(2) :213-217.DOI:10.13609/j.cnki.1000-0313.2024.02.012

2型糖尿病Gd-EOB-DTPA增强MRI肝肾影像改变

Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MRI of liver and kidney in type 2 diabetes

孙昊洋 1张文玉 2张文龙2
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 250001 济南,山东中医药大学附属医院放射科
  • 2. 250017 济南,山东省肿瘤防治研究院(山东省肿瘤医院),山东第一医科大学(山东省医学科学院)影像科
  • 折叠

摘要

目的:探讨2型糖尿病(T2D)患者钆塞酸二钠(Gd-EOB-DTPA)增强MRI肝胆期的肝肾影像改变.方法:搜集82例接受Gd-EOB-DTPA增强MRI腹部检查的患者(肝肾功能正常),其中T2D患者34例(观察组),非T2D患者48例(对照组).两位医师分别计算肝胆期肝脏相对信号强度(RL)、肾皮质和髓质相对信号强度(Rrc、Rrm)、肾皮髓质信号强度的相对差异(Rc-m).采用独立样本t检验或Mann-Whitney U检验比较观察组与对照组的相关参数差异.选择组间差异有统计学意义的变量,使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析其鉴别T2D的效能;采用组内相关系数(ICC)评估其可重复性.结果:观察组的RL、Rc-m均较对照组降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组的Rrc、Rrm差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).RL和Rc-m鉴别T2D的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.78和0.72,诊断敏感度分别为77.10%和64.60%,特异度分别为70.60%和79.40%.RL和Rc-m的观察者间一致性均较好,RL和Rc-m的ICC分别为0.91和0.89.结论:T2D患者Gd-EOB-DTPA增强 MRI肝胆期肝肾RL和Rc-m降低.RL和Rc-m在一定条件下可能有助于鉴别T2D,其测量可重复性较好.

Abstract

Objective:To investigate the changes in liver and kidney images during the hepatobil-iary phase of gadoxetate disodium(Gd-EOB-DTPA)enhanced MRI in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2D).Methods:Eighty-two patients with normal liver and kidney function who underwent abdominal Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MRI were collected,including 34 patients with T2D(observation group)and 48 patients without T2D(control group).The relative signal intensity(RI)of the liver in the hepatobiliary phase,the relative SI of the renal cortex and medulla(Rrc and Rrm),and the rela-tive difference in the signal intensity of the renal corticomedulla(Rc-m)during the hepatobiliary pha-ses were calculated respectively by two radiologists.The independent samples t-test or Mann-Whitney U statistic was used to compare the differences in relevant parameters between the observation and control groups.Statistically significant variables were selected,and the receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve was used to analyze their efficacy in identifying T2D.The intraclass correlation coeffi-cient(ICC)was used to evaluate the reproducibility.Results:RL and Rc-m in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group(P<0.05),and there was no statistically sig-nificant difference for Rrc and Rrm(P>0.05).The areas under the ROC curves for the identification of T2D by RL and Rc-m were 0.78 and 0.72,respectively.The sensitivity and specificity of RL and Rc-m in differentiating T2D were 77.10%,70.60%and 64.60%,79.40%,respectively.Both RL and Rc-m showed good inter-observer consistency,with ICC of 0.91 and 0.89 for RL and Rc-m,respectively.Con-clusion:The RL and Rc-m of liver and kidney decreased during the hepatobiliary phase of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI in T2D patients.RL and Rc-m might help to identify T2D under certain condi-tions with good reproducibility.

关键词

2型糖尿病/Gd-EOB-DTPA/磁共振成像/肝脏/肾脏

Key words

Type 2 diabetes/Gd-EOB-DTPA/Magnetic resonance imaging/Liver/Kidney

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
放射学实践
华中科技大学同济医学院

放射学实践

CSTPCDCSCD北大核心
影响因子:1.08
ISSN:1000-0313
参考文献量25
段落导航相关论文