首页|指令型行政辅助:一种正在形成的私人参与行政方式

指令型行政辅助:一种正在形成的私人参与行政方式

扫码查看
近年来突发事件频发,风险协同治理成为私主体参与行政的重要情境.在此情境下,因时间紧迫导致略去了事先的详尽考察、强制指令替代了 自愿合意、程序简化的概括授意取代了程序完备的书面契约,实际上已经超出了行政授权、行政委托理论的辐射边界,造成私主体身份不明、责任空心化的局面.私主体躲在公权力外壳之下"肆意妄为",又不能为相对人提供责任回溯的具体文件,在协同治理的口号下悄然进行着行政责任的分散乃至消解,导致公权力向私法逃遁.为此,本文在制度演进和实践样态的交互中寻找理论基点,在厘清嵌入私人参与行政光谱的实质要素的基础上,提出"指令型行政辅助"概念作为归置容器.指令型行政辅助与常态下私人参与行政的控权模式有所不同,主要在于控权重心的挪移,即以事后的责任追究为主、以事先的行为规范为辅,具体包括厘清行政辅助三方主体的法律关系,规范指令和辅助行为的作出形式,并明晰行政辅助侵权责任性质和赔偿责任的分配.
Directive Administrative Assistance:An Emerging Form of Private Participation in Administration
In recent years,the emergencies have been frequent,and risk management has become an important situation for pri-vate subjects to participate in administration.In this situation,the time urgency has led to the omission of prior detailed investiga-tion,the replacement of voluntary consent by mandatory instructions,and the replacement of procedurally complete written con-tracts by simplified general authorization,which has actually exceeded the radiation boundary of administrative authorization and administrative delegation theory,resulting in the unknown identity and hollowed-out responsibility of private subjects.The situa-tion.The private subject hides under the shell of public power and cannot provide the relative with the specific document of re-sponsibility retrospectively,and under the slogan of collaborative govemance,the administrative responsibility is quietly dispersed and even dissolved,leading to the escape of public power to private law.To this end,this paper searches for a theoretical base in the interaction of institutional evolution and practice patterns,and proposes the concept of"directive administrative assistance"as a repository on the basis of clarifying the substantive elements embedded in the administrative spectrum of private participation.The main difference between directive administrative assistance and the normal control mode of private participation in administra-tion lies in the shift of the focus of control,i.e.,the post-facto accountability is the main focus,supplemented by the prior regu-lation of behavior,including clarifying the legal relationship between the three subjects of administrative assistance,regulating the form of directive and auxiliary behavior,and clarifying the nature of administrative assistance tort liability and the distribution of liability.

directive administrative assistanceprivate participation in administrationcollaborative risk managementadminis-trative litigationstate compensation and recovery

莫于川、许佳莹

展开 >

中国人民大学法学院,北京 100872

指令型行政辅助 私人参与行政 风险协同治理 行政诉讼 行政赔偿与追偿

国家社科基金重大项目

20&ZD175

2024

法学论坛
山东省法学会

法学论坛

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:1.873
ISSN:1009-8003
年,卷(期):2024.39(1)
  • 68