首页|同时履行抗辩权阻却刑事不法的逻辑梳理与制度调适

同时履行抗辩权阻却刑事不法的逻辑梳理与制度调适

扫码查看
执行程序并不解决实体问题,因此同时履行抗辩权作为实体权利,并不天然阻却拒不执行判决、裁定罪的成立.但不承认同时履行抗辩权可以影响刑事不法认定的立场,过于强调公法和私法的区分,以及程序性规定和实体性规定的区分,忽视了在现代法治实践中公法和私法相互影响的趋势,以及权利实现过程的程序关联性.承认同时履行抗辩权可以通过影响违法性评价的方式影响刑事不法认定的观点,更符合同时履行抗辩权的制度目的.我们不应当采取形式化的立场实现同时履行抗辩权同刑事责任评价的衔接,而应当基于实质评价的立场,在进行利益衡量的基础上,决定同时履行抗辩权在何种程度上可以影响刑事不法评价.对于未确定先后履行顺序的刑事判决,同时履行抗辩权可以阻却行为的违法性;而对于确定了先后履行顺序的刑事判决,同时履行抗辩权只能阻却可罚的违法性.
Subject:The Logical Combing and Institution Adjustment of the Right of Concurrent Performing Counterplea Obstructing Criminal Illegality
The execution procedure does not resolve substantive issues.Hence,the right of simultaneous performance defense,as a substantive right,does not inherently prevent the establishment of the crime of refusing to execute a judgment or ruling.Howev-er,The standpoint of disregarding the impact of this right on criminal illegality overly emphasizes the distinction between public and private law,as well as procedural and substantive regulations,ignores the trend of their mutual influence in modern legal practice and the procedural relevance in the realization of rights.Recognizing this right can influence criminal illegality through its impact on illegality assessment and aligns better with the system's purpose.Instead of a formal link to criminal responsibility,we should base decisions on substantive evaluation of its impact on criminality,balancing interests.For criminal judgments without a specified order of performance,the right can negate the illegality of the act;whereas,for those with a specified order,it can only negate punishable illegality.

The right of simultaneous performance defensecriminal illegalitythe cause of illegality deterrenceinterest balan-cing

朱奇伟

展开 >

上海海事大学法学院,上海 201306

同时履行抗辩权 刑事不法 违法阻却事由 利益衡量

上海市哲学社会科学青年课题

2021EFX005

2024

法学论坛
山东省法学会

法学论坛

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:1.873
ISSN:1009-8003
年,卷(期):2024.39(5)
  • 25