首页|宪法通信权双重保护论

宪法通信权双重保护论

扫码查看
现行宪法上的通信权条款呈现为一种双层构造,其设定的宪法保护并非一般法律保留和加重法律保留,而是一般宪法保护与特别宪法保护.通信自由和通信秘密在内容上相互交织、不可分割,二者作为一个整体,既是实现言论自由的重要手段,也体现了国家对于公民个人隐私权的尊重和保障.肯定性的一般宪法保护和禁止性的特别宪法保护在功能上各有侧重,为通信自由和通信秘密提供着梯度化的动态保护;禁止性的特别宪法保护,针对的是具有侵犯属性的通信权干预方式.宪法针对通信检查这种典型的干预方式设定了通信检查三要件,通信检查构成相对禁止事项.在针对其他通信权干预方式的合宪性审查中,通信检查三要件具有参考价值.对于较为严重的通信权干预方式,应设定不低于通信检查三要件之严格程度的限制条件;对于相对缓和的干预方式,则适用不低于"受法律的保护"之严格程度的较低强度宪法保护.
The correspondence rights clause in the current Chinese Constitution presents a two-tiered structure,which creates constitutional protection not in the form of simple and aggravated legal reserva-tions,but in the form of general and special constitutional protection.Freedom of correspondence and confidentiality of correspondence are intertwined and inseparable in content and,as a whole,they are both important means of realizing the freedom of expression and embodying the State's respect for and protection of citizens'right to privacy.Affirmative general constitutional protection and prohibitive spe-cial constitutional protection are with different functional focus,and provide graded and dynamic protec-tion for the freedom and confidentiality of correspondence.Prohibitive special constitutional protection is directed against forms of interference with correspondence rights that are invasive in nature.The Consti-tution establishes three legal conditions of correspondence examination in relation to the typical form of interference,which constitute a relative prohibition.In the constitutional review of other means of inter-ference with correspondence rights,the three legal conditions of correspondence examination are of refer-ence value.For the more serious forms of interference in correspondence rights,a review standard no less strict than the three legal conditions of correspondence examination should be set,and for the rela-tively moderate forms of interference,a standard of constitutional protection no less strict than"protec-tion by law"should be applied.

correspondence rightsfreedom of correspondenceconfidentiality of correspondencele-gal reservationconstitutional review

屠振宇

展开 >

南开大学法学院

通信权 通信自由 通信秘密 法律保留 合宪性审查

天津市哲学社会科学规划2022年度重点项目

TJFX22-003

2024

法学研究
中国社会科学院法学研究所

法学研究

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:4.419
ISSN:1002-896X
年,卷(期):2024.46(1)
  • 13