首页|热分析技术对禁塑组分定性定量分析

热分析技术对禁塑组分定性定量分析

扫码查看
针对一次性不可降解塑料里的禁塑组分,建立了PBAT-PE、PBAT-EVA、PLA-PE、PLA-EVA模拟体系,采用热分析技术的热失重法(TGA)和差示扫描量热法(DSC)探究共混材料中PE、EVA等不可降解组分及其含量.采集含不同质量份数的PE或EVA的PBAT基和PLA基共混材料的热分析谱图,以TG的失重量和DSC的热流率与禁塑组分含量的关系进行分析,绘制定量曲线并作交叉验证.结果表明,TGA的方法优于DSC方法;由TGA方法知:PBAT基共混材料中PE或EVA的定量检出含量为8wt%;PLA基共混材料中PE或EVA的定量检出含量分别为15wt%、5wt%.故热分析技术可以定性定量检测,其中TGA定量禁塑组分的方法较为可靠,可实现简便的定性定量分析.
Qualitative and quantitative analysis of ban plastic components using thermal analysis technology
PBAT-PE,PBAT-EVA,PLA-PE and PLA-EVA simulation systems were established for the ban plastic components.The non-degradable components such as PE and EVA and their contents in the blends were tested by thermogravimetric analysis(TGA)and differential scanning calorimetry(DSC).The thermal analysis spectrogram of PBAT-based and PLA-based blending material with varying mass fraction of PE or EVA were obtained.Weight loss of TGA and heat of DSC were analyzed with the content of the ban plastic components,plotting quantitative curves and performing cross-verification.The results indicated that TGA method was superior to DSC method;TGA showed that the corresponding quantitative levels to the PBAT-PE,PBAT-EVA,PLA-PE and PLA-EVA simulation systems were 8wt%PE,8wt%EVA,15wt%PE and 5wt%EVA,respectively.The quantitative method of banned complications by TGA is more reliable and can achieve simple and fast qualitative and quantitative analysis.

Thermal analysis technologyWeight lossQualitative and quantitative detectionDisposable non-degradable plastic

张名楠、尚超男、周雪晴、谢艳丽、冯玉红

展开 >

海南大学分析测试中心,海口 570228

海南大学化学工程与技术学院,海口 570228

热分析技术 失重量 定性定量检测 一次性不可降解塑料

海南省重点研发计划项目海南省重点研发计划项目海南省重点研发计划项目

ZDYF2020024ZDYF2020186ZDYF2020009

2023

分析仪器
北京市北分仪器技术有限责任公司(北京分析仪器研究所) 中国仪器仪表行业协会

分析仪器

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.306
ISSN:1001-232X
年,卷(期):2023.(6)
  • 3