首页|庭审实质化与审判中心主义的结构性难题

庭审实质化与审判中心主义的结构性难题

扫码查看
在我国,"以审判为中心"是针对庭审空洞化或者庭审形骸化的现象提出的口号,其核心要义是庭审实质化。庭审流于形式,不仅有表层的对庭审不重视的原因,还有深层的诉讼结构上的原因,即我国刑事诉讼实行阶段论总体构造、诉讼重心被前置到侦查阶段、起诉标准与定罪标准一致等,造成庭审实质性调查功能的萎缩。不触及这些根本的症结原因,仅进行若干制度、程序的枝干式修补,只能够在一定范围内起到增强庭审实质化的作用,但不能从根本上解决庭审流于形式的问题。庭审实质化的深层结构问题涉及两大难题,一是以审判中心论取代诉讼阶段论并进行相应的实质性制度调整,二是截断侦查与审判的直接承接关系,实行起诉状一本主义。在不触及上述两个难题的现有诉讼制度框架内强化庭审实质性,需要进行若干制度的引入或者某些诉讼权利的强化,包括严格适用直接、言词原则,确立传闻证据法则,保障对质诘问权以及与之相关的证人之强制出庭,进一步完善国民参与司法的制度等,均能在一定程度上改善庭审空洞化问题。在《刑事诉讼法》第四次修改中,进行刑事诉讼深层结构的调整尚难实现,而在审判中心主义功能化的过程中,上述诉讼原则、制度和权利的增补或者强化是必要的和可行的。
The Structural Difficulties of Substantive Trial and Trial Centrism
In China,the slogan"putting the trial at the center"was proposed to address the phenomenon of court trials becoming hollow or superficial.The essence lies in the materialization of court trials.The fact that court trials have become a mere formality is not only due to superfi-cial reasons such as neglecting court trials,but also stems from deep-seated issues about the lit-igation structure.These issues include the overall structure of the stage theory in China's crimi-nal litigation,the prioritization of the litigation center to the investigation stage,and the align-ment of prosecution and conviction standards.All of these have led to the diminution of the sub-stantive investigation function within court trials.Without addressing these fundamental causes,implementing superficial repairs to systems and procedures can only enhance the substantive na-ture of court trials to a very limited degree,but cannot fundamentally solve the issue of court trials becoming mere formalities.The deep structural issues of trial substantiation involve two major challenges:firstly,replacing the stage theory of litigation with a trial-centered theory and mak-ing corresponding substantive institutional adjustments;secondly,severing the direct connection between investigation and trial,and implementing the principle of one prosecution statement.Within the existing framework of the litigation settlement system,which does not address the aforementioned challenges,it is necessary to strengthen the substantive nature of court trials by introducing several systems or enhancing certain litigation rights.This includes strictly applying the principle of direct verbal communication,establishing the hearsay rule,ensuring the right to cross-examine and the compulsory appearance of related witnesses,and further improving the system of publics'participation in the judiciary.All of these measures can,to some extent,alle-viate the issue of court trials becoming hollow.In the fourth amendment of the Criminal Procedure Law,it is still difficult to achieve adjustments to the deep structure of criminal procedure.How-ever,the supplementation or strengthening of the aforementioned litigation principles,systems,and rights is both necessary and feasible in the process of functionalizing trial-centeredness.

substantive trialoverall structure of litigationone book principle of prosecu-tiondirect verbal principlehearsay rule

张建伟

展开 >

清华大学法学院 北京 100871

庭审实质化 诉讼总体结构 起诉状一本主义 直接、言词原则 传闻证据法则

2025

法学杂志
北京市法学会

法学杂志

北大核心
影响因子:1.402
ISSN:1001-618X
年,卷(期):2025.46(1)