首页|人工智能的法律主体地位之争

人工智能的法律主体地位之争

扫码查看
随着人工智能的科技热点逐渐兴起,人工智能与法学的交叉研究也逐渐增加,人工智能的法律主体地位的争论是热议焦点之一。然而,由于缺乏对人工智能的准确理解以及忽视法学研究的规范性和现实性,现有争论存在两方面缺陷:其一,讨论域缺乏实质意义;其二,研究路径违背逻辑规律。通过反思人工智能的法律主体地位之争,既能有助于避免陷入研究伪问题的虚假学术繁荣里,还能提醒人工智能法学的研究必须建立在深入了解和理性分析人工智能的基础之上,在常识和本质中寻找到法学的真问题。法律技术问题以及人工智能的法律主体地位等无需实质性改变既定法律的适用问题是法学的伪问题,人工智能带来的新现象使得既有法律无法调整新型行为的适用问题和法的元问题才是法学的真问题。
Overview,Defects and reflections:the debate on the legal subject status of artificial intelligence
With the rise of the scientific and technological hotspot of artificial intelligence,the cross-research of artificial intelligence and law has gradually increased,and the debate on the status of the legal subject of artificial intelligence is one of the hot topics.However,due to the lack of accurate understanding of artificial intelligence and the neglect of the standardization and reality of legal research,there are two defects in the existing debate:first,the discussion domain lacks substantive meaning;Second,the research path violates the logic law.By reflecting on the dispute over the legal subject status of artificial intelligence,it can not only help avoid falling into the false academic prosperity of studying false problems,but also remind the research of artificial intelligence law must be built on the basis of in-depth understanding and rational analysis of artificial intelligence,and find the true problems of law in common sense and essence.The legal technical problems and the legal subject status of artificial intelligence,which do not need to substantially change the application of established laws,are the pseudo-problems of jurisprudence.The new phenomena brought by artificial intelligence make the existing laws unable to adjust the application of new behaviors and the meta-problems of law are the real problems of jurisprudence.

artificial intelligencelegal subject statustrue problemfalse problem

朱羿臣

展开 >

华东政法大学 法律学院,上海 松江 201600

人工智能 法律主体地位 真问题 伪问题

2024

阜阳职业技术学院学报
阜阳职业技术学院

阜阳职业技术学院学报

影响因子:0.152
ISSN:1672-4437
年,卷(期):2024.35(4)