首页|论社会法的整体本位

论社会法的整体本位

扫码查看
我国古代以整体为法律本位,经近代发展后转为现代以个体为法律本位.个体本位法律高扬个体权利,具有极大的历史进步意义,但是个体本位法律存在无法应对公共利益危机、社会达尔文效应,也存在无法有效规范整体权利等局限.整体本位社会法肯定社会整体利益的独立性;个体基于整体成员身份共享整体权利,对整体利益享有管理和维护权;整体是独立的有机体,整体对个体负有生存维护义务,个体对整体的存在、发展负有社会义务;如此,整体本位法律与个体本位法律得以实现优势互补.
On the Whole Standard of Social Law
The legal standard of China has changed from the ancient whole standard to the modern individual standard.The individual-based law has great significance of historical progress in that it promotes individual rights.However,individual standard law has limitations such as being unable to deal with public interest crises,social Darwinian effects,as well as failure in effectively regulating overall rights.The whole standard social law affirms the independence of the overall interests of the society;the individual shares the overall rights based on the membership of the whole,and has the right to manage and maintain the overall interests;the whole is an independent organism that has the obligation to ensure the survival and development of the individuals,meanwhile the individuals have social obligations for the existence and development of the whole.In this way,whole standard law and individual standard law can complement each other.

social lawwhole standardindividual standardsocial interest

刘清生、范炎鑫

展开 >

福州大学法学院,福建福州 350108

社会法 整体本位 个体本位 社会利益

国家社会科学基金

19BFX173

2024

福州大学学报(哲学社会科学版)
福州大学

福州大学学报(哲学社会科学版)

CHSSCD
影响因子:0.516
ISSN:1002-3321
年,卷(期):2024.38(2)
  • 29