首页|Digital Twins for Engineering Asset Management:Synthesis,Analytical Framework,and Future Directions
Digital Twins for Engineering Asset Management:Synthesis,Analytical Framework,and Future Directions
扫码查看
点击上方二维码区域，可以放大扫码查看
原文链接
万方数据
维普
Effective engineering asset management(EAM)is critical to economic development and improving liv-ability in society,but its complexity often impedes optimal asset functionalities.Digital twins(DTs)could revolutionize the EAM paradigm by bidirectionally linking the physical and digital worlds in real time.There is great industrial and academic interest in DTs for EAM.However,previous review studies have predominately focused on technical aspects using limited life-cycle perspectives,failing to holistically synthesize DTs for EAM from the managerial point of view.Based on a systematic literature review,we introduce an analytical framework for describing DTs for EAM,which encompasses three levels:DT 1.0 for technical EAM,DT 2.0 for technical-human EAM,and DT 3.0 for technical-environmental EAM.Using this framework,we identify what is known,what is unknown,and future directions at each level.DT 1.0 addresses issues of asset quality,progress,and cost management,generating technical value.It lacks multi-objective self-adaptive EAM,however,and suffers from high application cost.It is impera-tive to enable closed-loop EAM in order to provide various functional services with affordable DT 1.0.DT 2.0 accommodates issues of human-machine symbiosis,safety,and flexibility management,generating managerial value beyond the technical performance improvement of engineering assets.However,DT 2.0 currently lacks the automation and security of human-machine interactions and the managerial value related to humans is not prominent enough.Future research needs to align technical and managerial value with highly automated and secure DT 2.0.DT 3.0 covers issues of participatory governance,orga-nization management,sustainable development,and resilience enhancement,generating macro social value.Yet it suffers from organizational fragmentation and can only address limited social governance issues.Numerous research opportunities exist to coordinate different stakeholders.Similarly,future research opportunities exist to develop DT 3.0 in a more open and complex system.
Yongkui Li、Qinyue Wang、Xiyu Pan、Jian Zuo、Jinying Xu、Yilong Han
展开 >
School of Economics and Management,Tongji University,Shanghai 200092,China
School of Civil and Environmental Engineering,Georgia Institute of Technology,Atlanta,GA 30332,USA
School of Architecture and Civil Engineering,The University of Adelaide,Adelaide,SA 5005,Australia
Department of Engineering,University of Cambridge,Cambridge CB3 0FA,UK
展开 >
National Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Social Science Fund of ChinaNational Social Science Fund of ChinaNational Key Research and Development(R&D)Program of ChinaEuropean Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sk?odowska-CurieSupport Program for Young and Middle-Tech Leading Talents of Tongji University
万方数据
维普
