The pricing model for government and state-funded projects in China follows the national standard bill of quantities(BOQ)combined with quota-based pricing.The BOQ specifications categorize items according to specialized projects,where each contracting party calculates the quantities for each BOQ item under unified measurement rules,and then derives the project cost based on the quotas[1,2].With the demand for high-quality development in the construction industry,deepening reforms towards market-based pricing,which more accurately reflects current market price levels,has become imperative[3].To promote market-based pricing reforms and explore the differences between market-based pricing and quota-based pricing,this paper clarifies the overall situation of adopting market-based maximum bid price estimation.Using the cost reform pilot projects in Wuhan as a case study,the paper analyzes and identifies key comparative points between market-based and quota-based pricing for pilot projects.Through a three-level comparison,it deeply examines the differences in the formation of the maximum bid price under both pricing models.The conclusions drawn from the comparative analysis provide targeted recommendations for advancing market-based pricing reforms,thereby supporting further progress in market-based pricing reforms and offering a reference for the innovation of market-based price formation and control mechanisms.
关键词
工程造价改革/最高投标限价/市场化计价/国标清单定额计价
Key words
Construction cost reform/Maximum bid limit/Market-based pricing/National standard bill of quantities and quota pricing
维普
万方数据