摘要
关于包惠僧在中国共产党第一次全国代表大会的身份,在新中国成立前一直被作为正式代表并未受到质疑.然而,自新中国成立之初李达首次提出包惠僧是"列席代表"起,开始出现异议,先被中央领导人采信转而将包惠僧排除出中共一大代表,继而影响到除包惠僧以外其他身处国内的代表,从而衍生出党史正史和学术界的多种说法,如"串门说""陈独秀指定代表说"和"观察员说"等.然而,这些观点都存在诸多不足和明显漏洞.梳理、比对和分析现有文献资料及多数口述史料不难发现,包惠僧不仅是中共一大正式代表,而且是广东党组织的代表,这不应存在任何争议.
Abstract
Before the founding of New China,Bao Huiseng's status as an official representative to the First National Congress of the Communist Party of China was not questioned.However,since Li Da first proposed that Bao Huiseng was a"non-voting delegate"at the beginning of New China,objections began to emerge,first being accepted by the leader of the country,who excluded Bao Huiseng as an official representative to the First National Congress of the Communist Party of China,and then affecting other representatives in China except Bao Huiseng,thus giving rise to a variety of arguments in Party history and academia,such as"the argument of the visitor","the argument of Chen Duxiu's assigned representative",and"the argument of the observer",etc.However,there are many shortcomings and obvious loopholes in these views.After combing,comparing,and analyzing the existing documents and most oral historical materials,it is not difficult to find out that Bao Huiseng was not only the official representative of the First National Congress of the Communist Party of China,but also the official representative of Guangdong,and there should not be any controversy.
维普
万方数据