首页|骨碎补大棚栽培品与野生品的广靶代谢组学比较分析

骨碎补大棚栽培品与野生品的广靶代谢组学比较分析

扫码查看
[目的]骨碎补是一种多年生传统中药材,目前药材原料多来源于野生采集,鲜见有人工栽培的报道。因过度采集,骨碎补野生资源破坏严重,导致药材资源锐减,人工种植成为必然趋势。在探索骨碎补设施大棚栽培技术的基础上,利用代谢组学技术开展大棚栽培药材与野生药材的靶向代谢组学比较研究,探讨栽培品与野生品主要代谢产物的差异,为骨碎补人工栽培技术推广提供依据。[方法]以骨碎补基源植物槲蕨为研究对象,采用UPLC-MS/MS分析技术对比分析设施大棚栽培 3 年的槲蕨根茎与其野生根茎之间的差异代谢物,并开展差异代谢物富集通路分析。[结果]从两种药材检测到的 749 种代谢物中筛选到 100 种差异代谢物,且与野生品相比,大棚栽培品中有 58 种代谢物含量上调、42 种含量下调。这些差异代谢物主要包括黄酮类化合物、有机酸、氨基酸及其衍生物、酚酸类、生物碱、游离脂肪酸等。在大棚栽培品中,黄酮醇、黄酮碳糖苷、糖及糖类代谢物含量全部上调;而在野生品中,氨基酸及衍生物、酚酸类、溶血磷脂酰胆碱和花青素类代谢物含量上调幅度较大。通路富集分析结果显示,100 个差异代谢物共注释到 47 条代谢通路,其中显著富集的有维生素B6 代谢、芪类化合物生物合成、二芳基庚烷生物合成、姜酚的生物合成、黄酮和黄酮醇生物合成、半胱氨酸代谢、蛋氨酸代谢、花青素生物合成、氨酰基tRNA生物合成等途径。[结论]大棚栽培的骨碎补,其黄酮醇、黄酮碳糖苷、糖及糖类代谢物化合物含量显著高于野生品,因总黄酮被公认为主要药效成分,因此大棚栽培的骨碎补比野生品具有主效成分优势,可为骨碎补规模化设施栽培或人工栽培提供科学依据。
Comparative Analysis of Broad-targeted Metabolomics Between Greenhouse Cultivated and Wild Collected Drynaria fortune
[Objective]Drynaria fortunei is a perennial traditional Chinese medicinal herb.Currently,most medicinal materials of this herb are obtained through wild collection,with few reports on artificial cultivation.Due to excessive collection,the wild resources of D.fortune have been severely damaged,leading to a significant decline in medicinal resources.As a result,artificial cultivation has become an inevitable trend.On the basis of exploring the greenhouse cultivation technology of D.fortune,a targeted metabolomics comparative study was conducted between greenhouse-cultivated rhizomes and wild rhizomes by using metabolomics technology.The study aimed to explore the differences in the main metabolites between cultivated and wild rhizomes to provide a basis for the promotion of artificial cultivation technology of D.fortune.[Method]Taking the original plant of Rhizoma Drynariae,D.fortune as research object,and UPLC-MS/MS analysis technology was utilized to compare and analyze the differential metabolites between three-year greenhouse-cultivated rhizomes and three-year wild rhizomes.Subsequently,enrichment pathway analysis of differential metabolites was conducted by the KEGG pathway database.[Result]Among 749 metabolites detected from two D.fortune samples,100 differential metabolites were screened.Compared with wild samples,there were 58 upregulated metabolites and 42 downregulated metabolites in greenhouse-cultivated samples.These differential metabolites mainly included flavonoids,organic acids,amino acids and their derivatives,phenolic acids,alkaloids,free fatty acids and other metabolites.In greenhouse-cultivated samples,flavonols,flavonoid glycosides,sugars and carbohydrate metabolites were all upregulated.Conversely,in wild samples,amino acids and their derivatives,phenolic acids,lysophosphatidylcholine and anthocyanin metabolites were upregulated to a greater extent.Further pathway enrichment analysis revealed that 100 differential metabolites were annotated into 47 metabolic pathways.Significantly enriched pathways included vitamin B6 metabolism,astragalus compound biosynthesis,diarylheptanoids biosynthesis,gingerol biosynthesis,flavonoid and flavonol biosynthesis,cysteine and methionine metabolism,anthocyanin biosynthesis and aminoacyl tRNA biosynthesis.[Conclusion]The contents of flavonols,flavonoid glycosides,sugars and carbohydrate metabolites in D.fortune cultivated in greenhouse are significantly higher than those in wild-collected D.fortune.Considering that the total flavonoids of D.fortune are recognized as the main active ingredients,greenhouse-cultivated D.fortune has the advantage of containing higher levels of active ingredients compared to wild-collected D.fortune.This finding can serve as a scientific basis for large-scale cultivation or artificial cultivation of D.fortune.

Rhizoma DrynariaeDrynaria fortunegreenhouse cultivationwild medicinal herbmetabolomicsflavone

邱道寿、罗永坚、李长发、杜长江、袁雪平

展开 >

广东省农业科学院作物研究所/广东省农作物遗传改良重点实验室,广东 广州 510640

中南林业科技大学生命科学与技术学院,湖南 长沙 410004

广东杨帆科技农业有限公司,广东 仁化 512399

翁源县恒之源农林科技有限公司,广东 翁源 512637

展开 >

骨碎补 槲蕨 大棚栽培 野生药材 代谢组学 黄酮

广东省科技计划广东省科技计划广东省科技专项广东省林业科技创新项目

2019B0303160082023B12120600382008310862707182021KJCX013

2024

广东农业科学
广东省农业科学院 华南农业大学

广东农业科学

CSTPCD
影响因子:0.556
ISSN:1004-874X
年,卷(期):2024.51(5)
  • 39