工会学学科定位:争议、边界与重释
Disciplinary Positioning of Trade Union Studies:Dispute,Boundary and Reinterpretation
覃伟津 1戴文宪2
作者信息
- 1. 华南理工大学马克思主义学院,广东 广州 510641
- 2. 中国劳动关系学院劳动关系与工会研究院,北京 100048
- 折叠
摘要
长期以来,学界在工会学学科定位上存在不少争议,形成了"三级学科(研究方向)论""二级学科论""交叉学科论"三种不同的观点,然而这些观点并没有解决工会学的学科定位模糊问题.学科定位模糊的一个重要原因,是模糊的学科边界.工会学与相关学科划清界限,主要是科学地认识和处理其与马克思主义理论学科的关系.由于工会学的研究对象、研究内容、研究方法、学科价值等无法被其他学科完全承载,工会学表现出跨学科、新领域特点,工会学学科需要自主性发展及"依附式"策略存在弊端,因而工会学的学科定位应当是法学门类中的一门独立的新兴交叉一级学科.
Abstract
For a long time,there has been a lot of controversies in the academic circle on the disciplinary positioning of trade union studies,which has formed three different viewpoints,"three-level disciplines(research direction)theory","two-level disciplines theory"and"interdisciplinary theory".However,these views have not solved the problem of ambiguous disciplinary positioning of trade union studies.An important cause of the fuzzy subject orientation is the fuzzy subject boundary.There is a clear boundary between trade union studies and related disciplines,especially between Marxist theory.As the research object,research content,research method and value of trade union studies cannot be carried completely by other disciplines,and trade union studies show the characteristics of interdisciplinary and new fields,the discipline of trade union studies needs independent development and the"dependency"strategy has drawbacks,so the discipline of trade union studies should be positioned as an independent emerging cross-level discipline in the category of law.
关键词
工会学/学科定位/独立学科/新兴交叉学科/一级学科Key words
trade union studies/disciplinary discipline/independent discipline/emerging interdisciplinary disciplines/first-level discipline引用本文复制引用
基金项目
广西壮族自治区哲学社会科学规划研究项目(23BML004)
出版年
2024
NETL
NSTL
万方数据