首页|董事责任限免条款的法律制度建构

董事责任限免条款的法律制度建构

扫码查看
由于我国公司董事面临较大法律风险的客观现实和2023《公司法》所提供的董事责任限免机制相对匮乏且充满缺陷,我国公司未来可以考虑在公司章程中设置董事责任限免条款,从而在降低公司运营成本的同时更好地吸引、留住管理人才.然而,由于2023《公司法》对之缺乏明确规定,董事责任限免条款自身及其具体设计的合法性、约束力都将面临巨大的不确定性.美国特拉华州在1986年为应对所谓的保险危机,在普通公司法中首次明确承认董事责任限免条款.但该规定在司法适用中引起巨大的理论与实务争议,最终导致其他的美国后继立法例在规制模式、例外规定上都对特拉华模式进行了重大调整.结合比较法经验和自身法律土壤,我国公司法在未来也应当明确承认董事责任限免条款的合法性、将其配置为"选入式"任意性规范、设置更契合本土需求的例外规定,并摒弃允许公司章程完全免除董事金钱赔偿责任的做法.
The Legal Construction of Exculpatory Provisions Pertaining to Director's Liability
Due to the reality that Chinese corporate directors are facing increasing legal risks and the lack of liability limiting or eliminating institutions in 2023-version Chinese Corporate Law,Chinese corporations should consider to add exculpatory provisions in their corporate bylaws to limit their operating cost and recruit and retain their directors.However,because there is no provision in corporate law to regulate this kind of provisions,their legitimate and effects are very uncertain.Responding to the so-called insurance crisis,the Delaware General Corporation Law firstly recognized exculpatory provisions in 1986.Due to the huge theoretical and practical debate brought by it,the other model laws or state corporate laws not only adopted it but adjust it to their need to varying extent.Combing experience from comparative law and the local legal background,the future Chinese Corporate Law should recognize the legitimacy of exculpatory provision,set it as an opt-in default rule,take example of other-than provisions in MBCA rather than Delaware and abolish the common practice that allowing bylaws to eliminate director's whole liabilities.

Director's LiabilityExculpatory ProvisionsDuty of LoyaltyDuty of CareDuty of Good Faith

楼秋然

展开 >

对外经济贸易大学法学院

董事责任 限免条款 忠实义务 勤勉义务 善意义务

2025

国家检察官学院学报
国家检察官学院

国家检察官学院学报

北大核心
影响因子:2.133
ISSN:1004-9428
年,卷(期):2025.33(1)