首页|以可采性为中心的刑事证据规则之建构

以可采性为中心的刑事证据规则之建构

扫码查看
我国现有刑事证据规则的核心内容是证明力的审查判断规则.为提高法庭发现真实的能力、促进以审判为中心的转变、提升证据规则的可操作性,我国刑事证据规则应当从过去的以证明力审查判断为中心转向以证据资格也就是可采性为中心.可采性规则主要包括关联性规则、品格证据规则、传闻证据规则、意见证据规则、验真规则等传统上被认为有助于提高发现事实之精确性而设置的规则,也包括特免权规则、非法证据排除规则等基于特定政策目标设置的规则.在我国,关联性规则、意见证据规则、特免权规则、验真规则等均已确立;品格证据规则虽然并无明确法律规定,实务中乃是以关联性为基础加以规制.传闻证据规则仍未确立.为实现从以证明力为中心的规则向以可采性为中心的规则转变,应当对现有的关联性规则、特免权规则加以完善,同时引入品格证据规则、传闻证据规则和认罪认罚具结书被撤回时犯罪嫌疑人、被告人在认罪认罚协商期间的供述排除规则.
On the Construction of Admissibility-centered Criminal Evidence Rules
The core content of the existing criminal evidence rules in China is the examination of probative value of evidence.To enhance the court's ability to discover the truth,promote the trial-centered reform,and improve the operability of the rules,the core content of the criminal evidence rules should be shifted from probative value to the qualification of evidence,that is,the admissibility of evidence.The rules of admissibility mainly include the rules of relevance,character evidence rules,hearsay rules,opinion evidence rules,and authentication rules,which are traditionally considered to enhance the precision of fact-finding.The rules of admissibility also include the privilege rules,the exclusionary rules for illegally obtained evidence and other rules set up for specific policy objectives.The rules of relevance,opinion evidence rules,the privilege rules,and authentication rules have been established in China.Although there is no explicit provision of the character evidence rule,it is regulated based on the rules of relevance in practice.However,the hearsay rule has not been established.To achieve the transition from rules centered on probative value to rules centered on admissibility,it is necessary to improve relevant evidence rules and the privilege rules,and to introduce character evidence rules,hearsay evidence rules,and the exclusionary rule of the statements made by suspects and defendants during the process of plea negotiation when the plea bargaining agreement is withdrawn.

Criminal Evidence RulesProbative Value CentrismQualification of EvidenceAdmissibility Centrism

易延友

展开 >

清华大学法学院

清华大学证据法研究中心

中国案例法学研究会

刑事证据规则 证明力中心主义 证据资格 可采性中心主义

2025

国家检察官学院学报
国家检察官学院

国家检察官学院学报

北大核心
影响因子:2.133
ISSN:1004-9428
年,卷(期):2025.33(1)