首页|人道主义介入的关系治理路径与"建设性介入"——以中国参与解决缅甸问题为例

人道主义介入的关系治理路径与"建设性介入"——以中国参与解决缅甸问题为例

扫码查看
作为冷战后一个突出的国际政治现象,人道主义介入在概念和实践层面都已备受争议.随着中国开始"建设性介入"地区人道主义危机,如何从理论上阐释中西模式的差别,进而为中国方式精准定位,已成为一项重要的战略性课题.本文通过对人道主义介入相关概念的辨析,以及对中西介入实践的比较研究发现,西方模式与中国的"建设性介入"方式代表了规则治理和关系治理两种不同的治理路径,它们的根本区别在于前者是对当事国主权履责越俎代庖,后者则是以尊重当事国主权为前提的辅助性介入.为了更好地阐释"建设性介入"的逻辑进路,本文提出了一个基于关系治理的分析框架,并以中国参与解决缅甸问题为例进行了深入探讨.文章认为,维护关系性利益是中国"建设性介入"缅甸问题的根本原因,中国的做法有助于推动缅甸各方构建信任关系,并在合理把握舒适度原则的基础上,循序渐进地为解决危机创造长期有利条件.作为对国际人道主义介入理论的发展和创新,"建设性介入"为全球人权治理提供了一种更为合理和可行的方案.
Relational Governance Path of Humanitarian Involvement and"Constructive Engagement":A Case Study of China's Engagement in Resolving the Myanmar Crisis
Since the post-Cold War era,humanitarian involvement has been a significant global political phenomenon that has generated debate on both a philosophical and practical level.With China's beginning to engage actively in regional humanitarian crises,an important strategic question has emerged:how to explain the theoretical distinctions between Chinese and Western modes of humanitarian involvement,as well as how to define the Chinese model more clearly.By analyzing humanitarian involvement concepts and comparing practices in China and the West,this paper concludes that the Western model and China's"constructive engagement"represent two distinct governance paths:rule-based governance and relational governance.The former exceeds its authority and violates the principle of sovereignty,whereas the latter benefits the country at issue by respecting its sovereignty.To understand the meaning and logic of"constructive engagement,"this study develops an analytical framework of relational governance and illustrates it with the example of China's"constructive engagement"in Myanmar.According to the paperwork,China's"constructive engagement"in Myanmar is motivated primarily by safeguarding co-interest.China's approach is conductive to promoting the building of trust among all parties in Myanmar.Furthermore,China is committed to the principle of comfort and works to create long-term favorable conditions for resolving the situation.As an extension and innovation of the paradigm of international humanitarian involvement,"constructive engagement"proposes a more acceptable and feasible solution to global human rights governance.

humanitarian involvementrelational governance"constructive engagement"Myanmar crisis

王传剑、刘晓健

展开 >

天津师范大学政治与行政学院(天津 邮编:300387)

人道主义介入 关系治理 "建设性介入" 缅甸问题

2025

国际论坛
北京外国语大学

国际论坛

北大核心
影响因子:0.664
ISSN:1008-1755
年,卷(期):2025.27(1)