国际思想评论2016,Vol.6Issue(3) :422-433.DOI:10.1080/21598282.2016.1197784

The Anthropocene: Thinking in "Deep Geological Time" or Deep Libidinal Time?

Ariel Salleh
国际思想评论2016,Vol.6Issue(3) :422-433.DOI:10.1080/21598282.2016.1197784

The Anthropocene: Thinking in "Deep Geological Time" or Deep Libidinal Time?

Ariel Salleh1
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. Department of Political Economy, School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
  • 折叠

Abstract

This essay offers a socialist feminist postcolonial interpretation of the Anthropocene concept as used in recent ecocriticism. In contesting the rigid positioning of Humanity over Nature, the paper draws on the Marxist psychoanalytic theory of non-identity in Theodor Adorno (1973) and Julia Kristeva (1973, 1977, 1978). Making an ecofeminist contribution to the new field of environmental humanities, it engages critically with the perspective of prominent US scholar Timothy Morton (2012). Its embodied materialist argument is that contemporary Eurocentric institutions, science, and philosophies are indeed shaped by affect as Morton believes, but not in the way that he envisages. In addition, it is suggested that the socialist feminist postcolonial politics of ecofeminism is already challenging the inevitable universality of the Anthropocene by building an Earth Democracy with epistemologies of care. It is concluded that understanding the Anthropocene notion, a phenomenon that is profoundly gendered, requires more than thinking in "deep geological time." Ultimately, all ecological awareness will demand a capacity for thinking in "deep libidinal time."

Key words

Environmental humanities/Anthropocene/Eurocentrism/Adorno/embodied materialism/epistemologies of care

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2016
国际思想评论

国际思想评论

ISSN:
参考文献量38
段落导航相关论文