国家图书馆学刊2024,Vol.33Issue(4) :30-41.DOI:10.13666/j.cnki.jnlc.2024.0404

我国公共图书馆评估定级工作回顾与思考

Review and Reflection on the Evaluation and Grading of Public Libraries in China

姜淑华 张振康
国家图书馆学刊2024,Vol.33Issue(4) :30-41.DOI:10.13666/j.cnki.jnlc.2024.0404

我国公共图书馆评估定级工作回顾与思考

Review and Reflection on the Evaluation and Grading of Public Libraries in China

姜淑华 1张振康2
扫码查看

作者信息

  • 1. 山东财经大学管理科学与工程学院
  • 2. 济南市图书馆
  • 折叠

摘要

公共图书馆评估定级工作对我国公共图书馆事业发展起到了重要的引导和推动作用,其本身也在不断改进和发展,呈现出很多鲜明的特点和可喜的趋势.本文通过对我国前七次公共图书馆评估工作的全景式扫描和客观分析,发现我国公共图书馆评估定级工作呈现出标准体系动态调整、评估标准不断提升、评估内容日趋综合、评估导向愈发凸显、逐步兼顾地区差异等特点和趋势,在工作组织、标准制定、地区平衡、结果运用等方面还存在一些不足,可做如下改进:大兴调查研究,树立正面评估导向;厘清主体责任,优化评估组织流程;丰富评估内容,设置多样激励方式;转变评价方式,科学弥合地区差异;加强理论研究,确保评估科学权威.表6.参考文献36.

Abstract

The evaluation and grading work of public libraries has played an important guiding and promoting role in the development of China's public library industry,and is also constantly improving and developing it-self,presenting many distinct characteristics and encouraging trends.This article provides a panoramic scan and objective analysis of the first seven evaluations of public libraries in China.It is found that the evaluation and grading work of public libraries in China presents characteristics and trends such as dynamic adjustment of the standard system,continuous improvement of evaluation standards,increasingly comprehensive evaluation con-tent,increasingly prominent evaluation orientation,and gradual consideration of regional differences.However,there are still some shortcomings in terms of work organization,standard formulation,regional balance,and ap-plication of results in this work.Improvements can be made in the following areas:promoting investigation and research,establishing a correct evaluation orientation;clarifying the main responsibilities and optimizing the e-valuation organizational process;enriching the evaluation content and setting up diverse incentive methods;transforming evaluation methods to scientifically bridge regional differences;strengthening theoretical research to ensure scientific and authoritative evaluation.6 tabs.36 refs.

关键词

公共图书馆/评估定级/评估标准/高质量发展

Key words

Public Library/Evaluation and Grading/Evaluation Criteria/High-Quality Development

引用本文复制引用

出版年

2024
国家图书馆学刊
中国国家图书馆

国家图书馆学刊

CSTPCDCSSCICHSSCD北大核心
影响因子:1.957
ISSN:1009-3125
段落导航相关论文