首页|基于层次分析-模糊综合评价的线上课程质量评价研究

基于层次分析-模糊综合评价的线上课程质量评价研究

扫码查看
原文链接
  • 国家科技期刊平台
  • NETL
  • NSTL
  • 万方数据
随着"互联网+"时代的到来,纯线上教学和线上-线下混合式教学已成为高等教育教学模式发展的新趋势,也是近年高等教育教学改革研究的热点.为淘汰"水课",国家大力打造线上"金课",期望起到标杆和导向作用.如何对线上课程教学质量进行全面、科学的评价则直接关系着提升线上课程质量、甄别线上课程含金量以及更好地发挥金课的"标杆"作用.该文以学生为中心,突出学生评价主体地位,考虑目前我国主流慕课平台的发展现状以及线上课程教学特点和规律,采用AHP层次分析法构建一套较全面、合理的线上课程质量评价指标体系,同时结合模糊综合评价法对线上课程质量进行量化评估.其成果可为高校或者广大教师进行线上课程质量评价提供理论支撑和指导建议.
With the rapid development of IT technology,pure online teaching and online-offline hybrid teaching have become a significant trend of teaching mode in higher education and a hot spot in the field of higher-education teaching reform in recent years.In order to improve the course quality,the ministry of education is carrying out a"National Level First Class Courses"program to launch a number of"Gold Courses"with excellent quality and high standard.An evaluation system of teaching quality of online courses plays a crucial role in promoting the quality of online courses and helping teachers to reflect.It is worth exploring how to construct a comprehensive and scientific evaluation system of online courses.In the paper,considering the characteristics of online teaching and development status of mainstream MOOC platforms in China,the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP)method is applied to design an evaluation factor system which is student-centered and takes students as dominant position of evaluation.Moreover,combining with the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation(FCE)method,the quality of online courses is quantitatively evaluated.The research can provide the theoretical support and guidance for teachers to evaluate quality of online courses.

Internet plusonline coursecourse evaluationanalytic hierarchy processfuzzy comprehensive evaluation

夏冬生、姚征、孙先念、于彦、崔春义、刘杨

展开 >

大连海事大学 交通运输工程学院,辽宁 大连 116026

大连海事大学 船舶与海洋工程学院,辽宁 大连 116026

互联网+ 线上课程 课程评价 层次分析法 模糊综合评价法

中国高等教育学会数字化课程资源研究专项中国学位与研究生教育学会研究课题辽宁省普通高等教育本科教学改革研究项目

2020SZYB162020MSA255辽教通[2022]166号-342

2024

10.19980/j.CN23-1593/G4.2024.02.023

高教学刊
黑龙江省创联文化传媒有限公司，黑龙江省高等教育教学评估中心

高教学刊

ISSN：2096-000x
年,卷(期)：2024.10(2)
  • 1
  • 2