首页|基于透射曲线拟合的高精度激光吸收光谱温度检测方法

基于透射曲线拟合的高精度激光吸收光谱温度检测方法

High Precision Tunable Laser Absorption Spectroscopy Temperature Detection Method Based on Transmission Curve Fitting

扫码查看
可调谐激光吸收光谱技术在流场检测领域应用越来越广泛,然而恶劣的现场应用环境对测试系统的环境适应性、抗噪声干扰能力提出了更高的要求.直接吸收光谱技术可以获得吸收峰的全部信息,对多类测试环境均适用,如风洞,发动机喷射流场等,然而受现场测试环境影响,获得的测试信号信噪比通常较差,难以实现高精度检测.针对这一问题,对直接吸收光谱技术的数据处理分析算法进行了分析研究,提出了一种基于透射曲线拟合的高精度温度反演分析方法.利用水汽在7 185.6和7 444.3 cm-1附近的吸收谱线,研制了基于直接吸收光谱检测技术的温度检测系统,开展了573K-1173K温度范围内测试信号的处理分析,对比分析了基线-吸收线型拟合算法与透射曲线拟合算法的反演结果.当检测温度为773 K时,相比基线—吸收线型拟合算法,透射曲线拟合算法在7 444.3 cm-1波段附近的逐点拟合误差峰峰值可以减小约30%,7 185.6 cm-1波段附近的逐点拟合误差峰峰值可以减小约16%.573~1 173 K温度范围内,透射曲线拟合算法反演温度最大误差为13 K,相比基线-吸收线型拟合算法减小了23 K.给测试信号加入不同幅度的随机噪声信号,两种算法反演温度的标准差均随噪声幅度的增加而增加,同时温度越高,温度反演标准差越大.当噪声的峰峰值分别为20、60和100 mV时,不同温度下基线-吸收线型拟合算法温度反演结果的标准差最小值为18 K,最大值为313 K,透射曲线拟合算法温度反演结果的标准差最小值为4 K,最大值为44 K.实验分析结果表明,相比基线-吸收线型拟合算法,透射曲线拟合算法可以修正激光器功率基线拟合误差,提高透射信号拟合精度,减小温度反演误差.对比不同噪声水平下测试信号的温度反演结果表明,透射曲线拟合算法在噪声干扰下可以实现更高的检测精度,具有更强的抗噪声干扰能力.
The tunable diode laser absorption spectroscopy technology is widely used in flow field detection.However,the harsh environment of on-site application puts higher requirements on the test system's environmental adaptability and anti-noise interference ability.Direct absorption spectroscopy technology can obtain all the information on the absorption spectrum and is suitable for many types of test environments,such as wind tunnels and engine flow fields.However,due to the influence of a harsh on-site test environment,the signal-to-noise ratio of the obtained signals is usually poor,and it isn't easy to achieve high-precision detection.This article analyzes the data processing and analysis algorithm of direct absorption spectroscopy technology and proposes a high-precision temperature analysis method based on transmission curve fitting for this problem.A temperature detection system based on direct absorption spectroscopy technology was developed using the absorption spectra of water vapor near 7 185.6 and 7 444.3 cm-1.The processing and analysis of test signals in the temperature range of 573~1 173 K were carried out.The analysis results of the baseline-absorption line fitting algorithm(BALF)and the transmission curve fitting(TCF)algorithm were compared.When the detection temperature was 773 K,compared with the BALF algorithm,the peak-to-peak fitting error near 7 444.3 cm-1 of the TCF algorithm can be reduced by about 30%,and the peak-to-peak fitting error near 7 185.6 cm 1 can be reduced by about 16%.In the temperature range of 573~1 173 K,the maximum error of the TCF algorithm for temperature inversion is 13 K,which is reduced by 23 K compared with the BALF algorithm.When random noise signals with different amplitudes were added to the test signals,the standard deviation of test results using these two algorithms increased with noise amplitude.Moreover,the higher the temperature,the greater the standard deviation of test results.When the peak-to-peak noise value was 20,60,and 100 mV respectively,for different temperatures,the minimum standard deviation of test results using the BALF algorithm was 18 K,and the maximum was 313 K.The minimum standard deviation of test results using the TCF algorithm is 4 K,and the maximum is 44 K.Experimental analysis results show that compared with the BALF algorithm,the TCF algorithm can correct the baseline fitting error of laser power,improve the fitting accuracy of transmission signals,and reduce temperature analysis errors.Comparing the temperature analysis results of test signals under different noise levels shows that the TCF algorithm can achieve higher detection accuracy and precision under noise interference and has stronger anti-noise interference ability.

Tunable diode laser absorption spectroscopyDirect absorption spectroscopyTemperature detectionTransmission curve fitting

高慧、姚树智、张蒙、姜萌、张子昊、王学锋、杨勇

展开 >

北京航天控制仪器研究所,北京 100089

可调谐激光吸收光谱 直接吸收光谱 温度检测 透射曲线拟合

国家自然科学基金项目

61827820

2024

光谱学与光谱分析
中国光学学会

光谱学与光谱分析

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:0.897
ISSN:1000-0593
年,卷(期):2024.44(11)