首页|苹果花期抗寒能力判定指标解析

苹果花期抗寒能力判定指标解析

扫码查看
【目的】解析衡量苹果花期抗寒能力的客观判定指标。【方法】以海棠类八棱海棠、达尔文以及苹果类长富2号、岩富10号、丹霞、嘎拉、金冠和OPAL为试材,利用模拟霜箱系统检测并明确各品种花朵子房过冷点、结冰点温度及差异性。设置不同降温梯度与制冷时长双因素试验,明确不同生境下各品种花朵子房受冻率及差异性,解析过冷点、结冰点温度与子房受冻率的相关性,结合不同品种花朵的生长发育指标调查,综合判断造成苹果花期抗寒能力差异的影响因子。【结果】海棠类八棱海棠、达尔文过冷点温度显著低于苹果品种,丹霞、长富2号过冷点温度低于其他品种,且与岩富10号、OPAL之间存在显著差异性。花朵子房过冷点与受冻率(-3℃降温1 h)存在显著线性相关性(R2=0.93),结冰点与受冻率间无显著相关性。八棱海棠与达尔文在开花持续时长、花量等指标方面较苹果品种具有明显优势,金冠、OPAL单位长度花量较富士多,盛花期完全开放花比率较低。多元线性回归模型表明,过冷点(X1)、开花持续时间(X2)、花量(X3)及盛花期完全开放花比率(X4)与子房受冻率(Y)存在多元线性相关性(R2=0.89),其中过冷点温度(X1)标准化系数达0.87,对子房受冻率影响最大。【结论】过冷点温度是衡量果树花朵子房抗寒能力的重要指标,但还需要结合花量、开花持续时间和盛花期完全开放花比率等花朵生长发育指标来综合判定不同品种花期抗寒能力。
Analysis of evaluation indexes of cold resistance of apple trees at flower-ing stage
【Objective】Field survey are usually used for cold resistance of different fruit trees, but this method has difficulty to exclude the interference of external factors such as different ecological condi-tions and cultivation mode, and can not really objectively evaluate the cold resistance of a certain vari-ety. By comparing the correlation between supercooling point and freezing point temperature of apple flower ovary and freezing rate under specific conditions, combining with the investigation of flower growth and development indexes of different varieties, a multiple linear regression model was estab-lished to determine the objective evaluation indexes of cold resistance of apple trees at flowering stage. The reasons for differences in cold resistance at flowering stage of some apple varieties were discussed.【Methods】The Malus species Malus robusta and Darwin, apple varieties Nagafu 2, Rockfu 10, Danxia, Gala, Gold Delicious, OPAL were used as test materials. The supercooling and freezing temperatures of ovaries were measured using a simulated frost box system. The differences among varieties in the aboveindexes were analyzed. A two-factors experiment based on cooling gradient and cooling time was used to determine the ovary freezing rate of different varieties. The linear fitting was carried out to analyze the relationship between the flower supercooling point, freezing point temperature and flower ovary freezing rate. The flowering duration, number of flowers per unit length, and the percentage of fully opened flowers at full bloom period were also investigated and analyzed to further clarify the influence of flower growth and development characteristics on freezing rate. The factors influencing the differ-ence of cold resistance of apple trees during flowering stage were comprehensively discussed.【Re-sults】There was no significant difference in the temperature of supercooling point and freezing point of central flowers and side flowers of the same variety. The supercooling point of M. robusta was the low-est (-4.27 ± 0.33℃), It was significantly different from those of the other varieties (p<0.05). Among the apple varieties, Danxia and Nagafu 2 had the lowest supercooling point temperature, which was sig-nificantly different from those of Rockfu 10 and OPAL. The freezing point temperature of OPAL was lower than those of most cultivars (p<0.05). The freezing rate of M. robusta and apple variety Danxia was lower, followed by Darwin, Nagafu 2 and Gala. Rockfu 10 had the highest freezing rate under the different temperature gradients and cooling duration. With the extension of cooling time, the ovary freezing rate of flowers increased under the same temperature gradient, even under mild freezing stress (-1℃). Regardless of mild or severe freezing stress, the freezing rate of apple flowers was affected by two factors. The first factor was the degree of cooling, and the other factor was the duration of cooling. After 1h treatment at-2,-3 and-4℃, there was a significant positive correlation between the freezing rate and the supercooling point of all varieties, and the linear correlation between them was the stron-gest at-3℃(R2=0.93). but there was no significant correlation between the freezing point and ovary freezing rate. The flowering time of M. robusta was the longest, followed by Darwin and Golden Deli-cious, and the other varieties lasted about 16 days. The flower quantity of branches per unit length of M. robusta was the largest, indicating that it had the flower quantity advantage, followed by Darwin and Golden Delicious, and Nagafu 2 had the least flower quantity. The ratios of fully opened flowers of M. robusta and Darwin were 82.33%and 80.67%, respectively, while the ratios of fully opened flowers of Golden Delicious and OPAL were less than 60%. The multiple linear regression model showed that there were multiple linear correlations (R2=0.89) between supercooling point (X1), flowering duration (X2), flowering quantity (X3), full flowering rate in full blooming period (X4) and freezing rate of ovaries (Y). According to the standardized coefficients and significance p values of different independent vari-ables, it could be found that the supercooling point temperature of the flowers was the main factor caus-ing the difference of the ovary freezing rate, followed by the flower quantity and the other flower growth and development indicators.【Conclusion】The supercooling point temperature was an impor-tant index to measure the cold resistance ability of apple flowers. The normalization coefficient of the supercooling point temperature was 0.87, which had the greatest influence on the freezing rate of ovary. It would be necessary to comprehensively judge the cold resistance ability of different apple varieties at flowering stage by combining the flower quantity, flowering duration, full blossom ratio and other flow-er growth and development indexes.

Malus domestica BorkhSupercooling pointFreezing pointFreezing rate of flower ova-ryComprehensive cold resistance at flowering stageJudgment standard

李晓龙、褚燕南、张磊、陈仁伟、张晓煜、岳海英、贾永华、王芳

展开 >

宁夏农林科学院园艺研究所,银川 750000

银川能源学院,银川 750000

宁夏气象科学研究所,银川 750002

宁夏农产品质量标准与检测技术研究所,银川 750000

展开 >

苹果 过冷点 结冰点 花朵子房受冻率 花期综合抗寒能力 判定指标

宁夏回族自治区重点研发计划项目宁夏回族自治区重点研发计划项目宁夏农林科学院农业高质量发展和生态保护科技创新示范项目农业农村部国家苹果产业技术体系宁夏自然科学基金

2021BBF020142022BBF02035NGSB-2021-1CARS-272020AAC03321

2022

果树学报
中国农业科学院郑州果树研究所

果树学报

CSTPCDCSCD北大核心
影响因子:1.486
ISSN:1009-9980
年,卷(期):2022.39(10)
  • 4
  • 16