首页|不同有机溶剂提取翠冠梨果皮蜡质效果比较研究

不同有机溶剂提取翠冠梨果皮蜡质效果比较研究

扫码查看
[目的]通过对不同有机溶剂提取梨果皮蜡质的安全性和有效性进行比较和鉴定,以筛选出低毒、高效的果皮蜡质提取溶剂,替代传统毒性较高的提取溶剂——三氯甲烷,为梨果皮蜡质相关研究工作奠定基础.[方法]以翠冠梨成熟果实为试材,用三氯甲烷(对照)和7种毒性相对较低的有机溶剂(碳酸二甲酯、乙醚、乙酸丁酯、丙酮、乙酸乙酯、甲醇、正己烷)分别提取果皮蜡质,并通过气相色谱-质谱联用仪进行蜡质组分检测,比较不同有机溶剂的毒性与蜡质提取效果.[结果]通过比较分析发现,甲醇和乙醚的蜡质提取效果整体较差;乙酸丁酯提取效果好于三氯甲烷,且毒性为三氯甲烷的1/14,但其挥发性差;正己烷虽然毒性最低,对烷烃提取效果较好,但其对萜类物质的提取效果较差,且属易燃易爆危化品.因此,这4种有机溶剂均不宜作为改良溶剂.丙酮提取萜类化合物含量为三氯甲烷的3倍,因此可以用作果皮萜类化合物提取的改良溶剂;乙酸乙酯的半数致死量(median lethal dose,LD50)为5620 mg·kg-1,毒性为三氯甲烷的1/6,且蜡质提取效果优于三氯甲烷,可作为替代溶剂;而碳酸二甲酯的LD50为13 000 mg·kg-1,毒性仅为三氯甲烷的1/14,提取效果与三氯甲烷相当,可作为替代溶剂.[结论]丙酮是提取萜类的优势型溶剂,可作为改良溶剂.乙酸乙酯蜡质提取效果优于三氯甲烷和碳酸二甲酯,且毒性较低,可作为蜡质提取最优溶剂.筛选出来的溶剂将有助于植物表皮蜡质提取及相关组分研究工作.
Comparison of cuticular wax extraction from pear fruit by different or-ganic solvents
[Objective]Establishing a comprehensive extraction protocol is the foundation for studying plant cuticular wax. Currently, organic reagents widely used in the study of extraction of plant cuticular wax, such as chloroform, dichloromethane, etc., are mostly highly toxic and pose certain risks to the physical and mental health of experimental personnel. Therefore, the safety and effectiveness of differ-ent organic solvents for extracting pear peel cuticular wax were compared and identified in this study, in order to screen out low-toxic and efficient extraction solvents for pear peel cuticular wax, and replace the chloroform of traditional extraction solvent with higher toxicity, laying a foundation for pear peel cu-ticular wax related research work.[Methods]The fruit of Cuiguan pear at 90 days after flowering was used as test material, and the cuticular wax of peel was extracted using chloroform as control group and seven other organic solvents with relatively low toxicity, including dimethyl carbonate, ether, butyl ace-tate, acetone, ethyl acetate, methanol, and n-hexane. The components of cuticular wax extracted by these different solvents were detected by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), and the ex-traction effect of cuticular wax were also compared from different perspectives such as the number of extracted cuticular wax compounds, content of total cuticular wax, and content of specific compounds.[Results]The number of cuticular wax compounds extracted from pear peel using two solvents, metha-nol and ether, is the least, with only 28 and 24, respectively, which have a generally low affection of cu-ticular wax extraction. Thirty-eight compounds of cuticular wax were extracted using butyl acetate, slightly lower than the number of compounds of cuticular wax extracted using chloroform, and the dis-tribution of the extracted compounds of cuticular wax is similar to that of chloroform. Therefore, the ex-traction effect of butyl acetate was similar to that of chloroform. In addition, the volatility of butyl ace-tate was much lower than that of chloroform, even though it was detected with higher extraction effect and much lower toxicity (1/14 toxicity of chloroform). Although n-hexane had the lowest toxicity and good extraction effect on alkanes, accounting for 73.7%of the total wax, its extraction effect on terpe-noids was insufficient, only accounting for 6.3%of the total wax, and it also belongs to flammable and explosive hazardous chemicals. Taken together, these four organic solvents are not suitable as improved solvents for extracting cuticular wax. On the contrary, the content of total cuticular wax extracted using acetone was the highest among all groups (0.56 mg · cm-2) and was 2.3 times higher than that of chloro-form. Thirty-six compounds of cuticular wax were extracted using acetone, slightly lower than the num-ber of cuticular wax extracted by chloroform. The content of terpenoids extracted using acetone was al-most three times higher than that of chloroform. Therefore it could be used as an improved solvent for the extraction of terpenoids from pear pericarp. The number of compounds of cuticular wax extracted using ethyl acetate was the highest, up to 41, and the distribution of the extracted compounds of cuticu-lar wax was similar to that of chloroform. Ethyl acetate, which has 1/6 toxicity of chloroform, was found to have a higher efficiency of cuticular wax extraction than chloroform. Thus it could be used as an alternative cuticular wax extraction solvent. In addition, the number of extracted cuticular wax com-pounds, content of total cuticular wax, and content of specific compound extracted were detected using dimethyl carbonate, which has similar wax extraction effect compared with chloroform but its toxicity was only 1/14 of chloroform. The results indicated that it could be an alternative solvent for extracting pear peel cuticular wax. Fifty-four wax compounds found in eight organic solvent detection were ana-lyzed through principal component analysis (PCA). The eight organic solvent detection could be divid-ed into five groups based on the relationships between organic solvents (scores) and their 54 wax com-pounds (loadings). Butyl acetate and ethyl acetate formed the first group, which were characterized by high concentrations of nonacosane in the extraction. Group two contained acetone and ether, which were characterized with high concentrations of terpenoids and low concentrations of alkanes. Group three including methanol, which were mainly characterized by low concentrations of terpenoids and al-kanes. n-hexane characterized by high concentrations of alkanes and low concentrations of terpenoids in the extract formed group four. The fifth group contained chloroform and dimethyl carbonate with no significant characteristics.[Conclusion]Acetone was the dominant solvent for the extraction of terpe-noids from pear fruit peel and can be used as an improved solvent. The extraction effect of cuticular wax using ethyl acetate was equivalent to that of chloroform and dimethyl carbonate, and it also has lower toxicity, which could be used as the optimal solvent to replace chloroform in the cuticular wax ex-traction progress. Thus, these selected solvents will be helpful for the work of extraction of cuticular wax and related components in plant.

PearCuticular waxOrganic solvents

吴潇、胡杨、蒙小玉、崔艳波、郎肖璇、齐开杰、张岩、张绍铃、殷豪

展开 >

南京农业大学三亚研究院,海南三亚 572024

南京农业大学睢宁梨产业研究院,江苏徐州 221299

南京农业大学园艺学院,南京 210095

南京宁翠生物种业有限公司,南京 211121

徐州市睢宁县农技推广中心果桑技术指导站,江苏徐州 221000

展开 >

蜡质 有机溶剂

南京市农业科技产学研合作专项三亚崖州湾科技城科技专项中央高校基本科研业务费专项江苏省自然科学基金青年项目国家自然科学基金青年项目中国博士后科学基金第4批特别资助(站前)卓博计划

2022RHCXY江宁05SCKJ-JYRC-2022-60KYQN2023031BK20221011322024112022TQ01602022ZB338

2023

果树学报
中国农业科学院郑州果树研究所

果树学报

CSTPCDCSCD北大核心
影响因子:1.486
ISSN:1009-9980
年,卷(期):2023.40(12)
  • 9