首页|平邑甜茶高位嫁接丽嘎拉苹果树冠层内枝类结构和果实品质、产量的分布

平邑甜茶高位嫁接丽嘎拉苹果树冠层内枝类结构和果实品质、产量的分布

扫码查看
[目的]掌握以平邑甜茶为砧木,采用高位嫁接方式的丽嘎拉苹果树冠层内枝类结构、果实产量和品质的分布特点,为辽宁寒地苹果园建设中应用该种栽培模式,提升果品质量、优化栽培措施提供参考.[方法]以丽嘎拉/GM256/平邑甜茶、丽嘎拉/平邑甜茶(高接)和丽嘎拉/平邑甜茶(低接)苹果树为试材,按照冠层分格的方法,将试验树从地面到顶部分成4个冠层,比较不同冠层高度内枝类结构、果实产量和品质的分布差异.[结果]丽嘎拉/平邑甜茶(高接)苹果树高、冠径、覆盖率生长速度高于丽嘎拉/GM256/平邑甜茶,丽嘎拉/平邑甜茶(高接)树体外观表现为"小脚"现象,而丽嘎拉/GM256/平邑甜茶表现为"大脚"现象.丽嘎拉/平邑甜茶(高接)苹果树枝量、短枝比例高于丽嘎拉/平邑甜茶(低接)和丽嘎拉/GM256/平邑甜茶.丽嘎拉/平邑甜茶(高接)、丽嘎拉/平邑甜茶(低接)和丽嘎拉/GM256/平邑甜茶枝量分布集中区域为冠层高度>2.00~3.00 m、>3.00 m和>1.00~2.00 m,占全树枝量比例的43.51%、45.37%和47.96%.相同冠层高度内,丽嘎拉/平邑甜茶(高接)果实单果质量、果形指数、硬度、可滴定酸含量、色差L和a值高于丽嘎拉/GM256/平邑甜茶.随着冠层高度的增加,丽嘎拉/平邑甜茶(高接)、丽嘎拉/平邑甜茶(低接)和丽嘎拉/GM256/平邑甜茶果实硬度、可滴定酸含量呈现下降趋势,而固酸比和色差值(L、a、b)呈现上升趋势.丽嘎拉/平邑甜茶(高接)和丽嘎拉/平邑甜茶(低接)果实产量主要分布在冠层高度>2.00 m的空间区域,占全树产量的69.79%和75.55%,而丽嘎拉/GM256/平邑甜茶为>1.00~3.00 m,占比全树产量的74.59%.[结论]以平邑甜茶为砧木,采用高位嫁接的丽嘎拉苹果树枝条数量多、短枝比例高、外观色泽好,树体枝量和果实产量分布集中区域为冠层高度>2.00~3.00 m,该冠层生产的苹果单果质量大、果形指数适中、可溶性固形物含量高.
Distribution of branch composition,fruit quality and yield within the tree canopy of Regal Gala/Malus hupehensis Rehd.by top grafting
[Objective]The stock-scion combination of Regal Gala with rootstock of Malus hupehensis Rehd.served as the experimental samples,which were top grafted.The spatial distribution characteris-tics of branch composition,fruit yield and fruit quality were investigated in different canopy layers,so as to provide a reference for the technical optimization and improvement of fruit quality with this culti-vation mode in cold regions of Liaoning province.[Methods]Three types of samples,including Regal Gala on the interstock of GM256 and rootstock of M.hupehensis Rehd.,Regal Gala on the rootstock of M.hupehensis Rehd.(top grafting),and Regal Gala on the rootstock of M.hupehensis Rehd.(low graft-ing),were used as experimental materials.In 2020,the basic development status of the test trees was in-vestigated,and indicators included trunk diameter of variety and rootstock,tree height,canopy width(east-west and south-north),coverage rate,etc.The experimental tree was divided into 4 layers accord-ing to the canopy height,and the number and proportion of branch types(long shoots,medium shoots and spurs)at different canopy heights were investigated.The differences in fruit yield and quality at dif-ferent canopy heights among the tested materials were compared.Surveyed indicators included fruit mass,fruit shape index,firmness,soluble solids,titratable acidity,TSS/TA ratio,color difference value(L,a,b),etc.[Results]The growth rate of tree height,canopy width and coverage rate of Regal Gala on the rootstock of M.hupehensis Rehd.(top grafting)was higher than that of Regal Gala on the inter-stock of GM256 and rootstock on M.hupehensis Rehd..There was difference in the growth rates be-tween the rootstock of M.hupehensis Rehd.and the interstock of GM256.The results showed obvious differences in the variety/rootstock ratio of the apple tree.Regal Gala on the rootstock of M.hupehensis Rehd.(top grafting)showed a'small foot'(The scion overgrows the stock),but a'big foot'in Regal Gala on the interstock of GM256 and rootstock of M.hupehensis Rehd..The number of branches and the proportion of spurs with Regal Gala on the rootstock of M.hupehensis Rehd.(top grafting)were higher than those of Regal Gala on the interstock of GM256 and rootstock of M.hupehensis Rehd.,and Regal Gala on the rootstock of M.hupehensis Rehd.(low grafting).The numbers of branches of Regal Gala on the rootstock of M.hupehensis Rehd.(top grafting),Regal Gala on interstock of GM256 and rootstock of M.hupehensis Rehd.,and Regal Gala on the rootstock of M.hupehensis Rehd.(low graft-ing)were 96.88 × 104 No.·hm 2,78.11 × 104 No.·hm-2 and 86.51 × 104 No.hm-2,respectively.The branches of Regal Gala on the rootstock of M.hupehensis Rehd.(top grafting),or on the rootstock of M.hupehensis Rehd.(low grafting)were mainly distributed within a canopy height of 2.00 to 3.00 m or greater than 3.0 m,accounting for 43.51%and 45.37%of the total number of branches,respectively.The height from 1.00 to 2.00 m was the main distribution area of Regal Gala on the interstock of GM256 and rootstock of M.hupehensis Rehd.,accounting for 47.96%of the total number of branches.There were differences in the spatial distribution of spurs within the tree crown between Regal Gala on the rootstock of M.hupehensis Rehd.(top grafting)and Regal Gala on the interstock of GM256 and rootstock of M.hupehensis Rehd..The spurs of Regal Gala on the rootstock of M.hupehensis Rehd.(top grafting)were mainly distributed in the canopy height of more than 2.00 m,accounting for 56.77%of the total number of branches.The spurs of Regal Gala on the interstock of GM256 and rootstock of M.hupehensis Rehd.were mainly distributed in the canopy height of 1.00 to 3.00 m,accounting for 59.31%of the total number of branches.Fruit mass,fruit index,firmness,titratable acidity,L and a val-ues of color difference with Regal Gala on the rootstock of M.hupehensis Rehd.(top grafting)were higher than those of Regal Gala on the interstock of GM256 and rootstock of M.hupehensis Rehd.with-in the same height of the canopy.The fruit quality within different canopy heights were compared,and it was found that the fruit firmness and titratable acidity of Regal Gala on the rootstock of M.hupehen-sis Rehd.(top grafting),the rootstock of M.hupehensis Rehd.(low grafting),or interstock of GM256 and rootstock of M.hupehensis Rehd.decreased with the increasing of canopy height,while TSS/TA value and L,a,b values of color difference showed an upward trend.At the canopy height from 2.00 to 3.00 m,the fruit mass,fruit index,and soluble solid content with Regal Gala on the rootstock of M.hu-pehensis Rehd.(top grafting)were the highest.Fruit mass and fruit index of Regal Gala on the inter-stock of GM256 and rootstock of M.hupehensis Rehd.were the highest at the canopy height of 1.00 to 2.00 m,soluble solid content was the highest at the canopy height of 2.00 to 3.00 m.Fruit mass of Re-gal Gala on the rootstock of M.hupehensis Rehd.(low grafting)was the highest when the canopy height was from 2.00 to 3.00 m,and soluble solid content was the highest at the canopy height of more than 3.00 m.There were significant differences in the distribution of fruit yield at different canopy heights.The fruit yield of Regal Gala on the rootstock of M.hupehensis Rehd.(top grafting)or(low grafting)were mainly concentrated in the spatial areas of more than 2.00 m,accounting for 69.79%and 75.55%of the total yield of the tree.The fruit yield of Regal Gala on the interstock of GM256 and root-stock of M.hupehensis Rehd.was concentrated from 1.00 to 3.00 m,accounting for 74.59%of the total production.Therefore,it can be seen that the concentrated distribution of fruit yield with Regal Gala on the rootstock of M.hupehensis Rehd.(top grafting)or(low grafting)were in the upper and middle parts of the tree canopy,while Regal Gala on the interstock of GM256 and rootstock of M.hupehensis Rehd.was in the middle part of the tree canopy.[Conclusion]Using M.hupehensis Rehd.as the rootstock and adopting top grafting method,the Regal Gala apple tree had larger coverage rate,more total branch-es,higher proportion of spurs,and better exterior fruit quality.The canopy height from 2.00 to 3.00 m was the concentrated area for the distribution of branches and fruit yield in the tree of Regal Gala on the rootstock of M.hupehensis Rehd.(top grafting).The characteristics of fruits produced in this canopy ar-ea were that fruit mass was higher,fruit index was better and soluble solids content was higher.The Re-gal Gala on the rootstock of M.hupehensis Rehd.,in which top grafting was adopted was suitable for application and promotion in the apple orchards in cold regions of Liaoning province.They were not on-ly easy to manage,but also conducive to increasing yield and income.

AppleBranch compositionQualityFruit yieldTree canopy

李宏建、于年文、宋哲、张秀美、里程辉、韩丽红、刘影、周家旭

展开 >

辽宁省果树科学研究所,辽宁营口 115009

苹果 枝类结构 品质 产量 树体冠层

营口市盖州苹果栽培管理科技特派团项目现代农业产业技术体系建设专项

2023JH1/0100007CARS-27

2024

果树学报
中国农业科学院郑州果树研究所

果树学报

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.486
ISSN:1009-9980
年,卷(期):2024.41(5)