首页|不同猕猴桃品种果实剥皮性状研究

不同猕猴桃品种果实剥皮性状研究

扫码查看
[目的]比较不同猕猴桃品种在软熟期果实剥皮性状的变化,建立猕猴桃果实剥皮性状综合评价体系,客观反映不同猕猴桃品种间果实剥皮难易程度的差异性.[方法]以25个猕猴桃品种为材料,对不同猕猴桃品种软熟期的果实先进行手动撕拉,通过观测皮肉分离过程中的"剥皮数"和"剥离度"两个参数来进行判断和评估,再结合基于力学测量装置构建的猕猴桃剥离器对不同猕猴桃品种进行剥皮力的测定.[结果]不同猕猴桃品种软熟期果实的剥皮数、剥离度及剥皮力不同.通过综合比较25个猕猴桃品种的果实剥皮数、剥离度和剥皮力得出:16个中华猕猴桃品种中金丰相对其他品种剥皮次数较少为18次,剥离度评价等级最高为3~4分,果肉受损程度较低,其次是金奉,在与其他品种剥皮数和剥离度评价等级相差不大的情况下,其所需的剥皮力平均值最小为0.42 N;果实大小一致的4个美味猕猴桃品种中米良1号相对其他品种剥皮数与剥离度相差不大,但所需剥皮力平均值为0.38 N,显著小于其他品种,果皮更易剥落且果肉受损程度更低;5个毛花猕猴桃品种中华特果皮最厚,果皮剥落顺畅,但所需剥皮力较大平均值为1.03 N,赣绿1号剥皮次数最少为7次,剥离度评价等级最高为7~8分且所需剥皮力平均值仅为0.47 N,相对其他品种更易剥皮且不费力,赣猕6号剥离度评价等级为5~6分,剥皮数最多为13次,相对其他品种更难剥皮.[结论]不同种类猕猴桃果实剥皮性状差异较大,其中毛花猕猴桃果实最容易剥皮,且在同一种类不同猕猴桃品种间的果实剥皮性状差异也较大,25个猕猴桃品种中毛花猕猴桃赣绿1号剥皮数最少、剥离度评价等级最高、剥皮力较小,因此是最容易剥皮的.
Study on fruit peeling characters of different kiwifruit varieties
[Objective]Actinidia chinensis var.chinensis and A.chinensis var.deliciosa are the main types of commercially cultivated kiwifruit at present,the inconvenience of peeling and eating both hin-der consumer's choice of kiwifruit.Some varieties of kiwifruit,such as A.eriantha generally has the characteristics of easy peeling,however,there is no comprehensive and objective evaluation system for the description of the peeling traits of different kiwifruit varieties.In this study,we compared the chang-es of fruit peeling traits of different kiwifruit varieties at soft ripening stage and established a compre-hensive evaluation system of kiwi-fruit peeling traits to objectively reflect the difference of fruit peeling difficulty among different kiwifuit varieties,which would lay a theoretical foundation for further re-search on the physiology and molecular mechanism of kiwi-fruit peeling.[Methods]Twenty-five kiwi-fruit varieties were used as materials,including 16 A.chinensis var.chinensis varieties,4 A.chinensis var.deliciosa varieties,and 5 A.eriantha varieties.The"peeling number","peeling degree"and"peel-ing force"of each kiwifruit variety were tested respectively.The number of peeling refered to the num-ber of skins removed from the whole fruit by manual tearing from the stylar end to the stalk end.The peeling degree was evaluated by assigning scores,which were divided into 5 grades according to peel and pulp peel degree(unable to peel at all,more difficult to peel,difficult to peel,easier to peel,easy to peel).Combined with the kiwifruit stripper based on the mechanical measuring device,the peeling force of each kiwifruit was determined by measuring the force in four directions of the fruit and calcu-lating the average value.Then the evaluation system of kiwifruit peeling traits was established by syn-thesizing the three indexes,and the differences of peeling traits among different kiwifruit varieties were compared.[Results]The peel number of A.eriantha was significantly less than those of A.chinensis var.chinensis and A.chinensis var.Deliciosa,and the peeling degree evaluation grade was significantly higher than those of the two varieties,indicating that A.eriantha was easier to peel and had better peel-ing property than the other two kiwifruit varieties.However,the peeling force of A.eriantha was not the smallest,and the peeling power of A.chinensis var.chinensis and A.chinensis var.Deliciosa was even lower than that of A.eriantha.Therefore,by comprehensively comparing the fruit peeling number,peel-ing degree and peeling force of different varieties of kiwifruit,three indexes were obtained:Among the 16 varieties of A.chinensis with the same fruit size,Jinfeng had less peeling times(18 times)than other varieties,the highest peeling degree was 3-4 points,and the pulp damage degree was lower,followed by Jin Feng,in the case of little difference in peeling number and peeling degree with other varieties,the average peeling force required was 0.42 N,which was the smallest.Among the 4 varieties of A.chi-nensis var.deliciosa with the same fruit size,Miliang No.1 had little difference in the peeling number and peeling degree compared with the other varieties,but the average peeling force required was only 0.38 N,the peel was easier to peel,and the pulp was less damaged,although 20 times of the peeling number of Guichang was the least,but the required peeling force was 1.20 N,the peel was also more difficult to peel.Among the 5 varieties of A.eriantha with the same fruit size,Ganlü No.1 had at least 7 peeling times compared with the others,and the highest peeling degree was 7-8 points,and Ganlü 6 had the peeling degree 5-6 points,the highest peeling number(13 times)and was relatively difficult to peel compared with the others.In summary,there were great differences in the peeling traits of different kiwifruit varieties.Among the 25 kiwifruit varieties,Ganlü No.1 had the lowest peeling number,the highest peeling degree,and the lower peeling force,second only to the lowest Jin Feng and Milang No.1,and it was the easiest to peel according to the evaluation of three indexes.The peeling number of Donghong and Hongshi No.2 was as high as 49 times and 52 times,the peeling degree grade was 0,the average peeling force required was 1.68 N and 1.59 N,significantly higher than those of the other kiwi-fruit varieties,so both were not easy to peel.[Conclusion]The fruit peeling characters of different kiwi-fruit species were different.At the same time,different varieties of the same kind of kiwifruit peeling characters also had great differences.By comprehensively comparing the fruit peeling number,peeling degree and peeling force of each variety of kiwifruit,among the 25 kiwifruit varieties,Ganlü No.1 had the lowest peeling number,the highest peeling degree evaluation grade,and the smallest peeling force,so it was the easiest to peel.

KiwifruitFruitPeeling characterPeeling numberPeeling force

黄丽红、伍梦婷、钟文奇、陶俊杰、贾慧敏、黄春辉

展开 >

江西农业大学农学院·江西农业大学猕猴桃研究所,南昌 330045

猕猴桃 果实 剥皮性状 剥皮数 剥皮力

2024

果树学报
中国农业科学院郑州果树研究所

果树学报

CSTPCD北大核心
影响因子:1.486
ISSN:1009-9980
年,卷(期):2024.41(12)