首页|不同光质对避雨栽培阳光玫瑰葡萄光合特性及果实品质的影响

不同光质对避雨栽培阳光玫瑰葡萄光合特性及果实品质的影响

扫码查看
[目的]探讨不同补光处理对避雨栽培阳光玫瑰葡萄(Vitis labrusca × V.vinifera'Shine Muscat')叶片光合特性及果实品质的影响,为避雨栽培中葡萄的补光应用提供一定的理论依据.[方法]以山东省泰安金牛山基地避雨栽培5年生阳光玫瑰葡萄为试验材料,设置不同光源(红光、白光、红蓝光2∶1、遮光)进行补光处理,补光期从萌芽期至果实成熟期,以不补光为对照.记录新梢生长指标,测定光合数据,检测叶绿素荧光参数,并测量单果质量、总酸(TA)和总可溶性固形物(TSS)的含量.在芽成熟后,通过qRT-PCR分析8个成花基因的表达,并于第2年统计花芽萌发率.[结果]红蓝光2∶1补光处理增加了阳光玫瑰葡萄叶片面积和新梢长度,PSⅡ最大光化学效率(Fv/Fm)、性能指数(PIabs)及净光合速率(Pn)和气孔导度(Gs)等光合相关参数得到提高;同时,促进了果实纵径、横径、单果质量的增加,提高了果实糖度.补光处理还促进了花芽萌发率,且影响了 VvGI、VvSOCl等光周期相关基因的表达.[结论]RBL2∶1补光能够显著增强阳光玫瑰葡萄的光合作用,改善果实大小及品质,且对第2年萌芽情况有显著改善.
Effect of different light qualities on photosynthetic characteristics and fruit quality of Shine Muscat grapevines grown under rain-sheltered cul-tivation
[Objective]Light serves as a pivotal environmental regulator in plant morphogenesis and physiological adaptation.Under grape facility cultivation,particularly with rain-shelter systems,insuffi-cient light frequently constrains photosynthetic efficiency and reproductive development.To address this limitation,spectral-modulated supplementary lighting emerges as a promising agronomic interven-tion.This study investigated the impacts of varied light qualities spectra on the ecophysiological re-sponses of Shine Muscat(Vitis labrusca × V.vinifera),with emphasis on foliar morpho-anatomical adap-tations,stem elongation dynamics,photosynthetic performance indices,fruit biochemical profiles and flower bud differentiation.The findings aim to establish a theoretical basis and practical guidance for optimizing supplementary lighting strategies under facility cultivation.[Methods]Five-year-old rain-sheltered Shine Muscat grapevines were used in this study.Four treatments were set:red light(RL),white light(WL),Redblue light 2∶1(RBL 2∶1)and CK(no-suplementary-light control).LED lamps(36 W,640 nm)were installed 30 cm above the canopy and operated 12 hours daily(8:00-20:00)from April 11th to September 7th,2023.Each treatment consisted of 10 vines with three replicates,separated by shading films.Leaf area,basal cane diameter and internode length were measured on 20 randomly selected canes per treatment after two months.Leaf area was calculated using the formula:Area=long axis × short axis ×π/4.For chlorophyll fluorescence parameters,leaves were dark-adapted for 20 min-utes,and then subjected to 1-second fluorescence induction using 3000 μmol m-2·s-1 light.JIP-test anal-ysis was used to calculate variable fluorescence(Vt)and its difference(ΔVt),along with other fluores-cence parameters.During the berry expansion stage,photosynthetic parameters were recorded on sunny days between 8:00 and 18:00 using a CIRAS-3 portable photosynthesis system.Measurements of Pn(net photosynthetic rate),Gs(stomatal conductance),Ci(intercellular CO2 concentration)and Tr(transpi-ration rate)were taken at six time points(8:00,10:00,12:00,14:00,16:00 and 18:00).For berry analy-sis,20 clusters were sampled for each treatment,and one berry from the top,middle and bottom of each cluster was measured for longitudinal and transverse diameters using a vernier caliper.Total soluble sol-ids(TSS)and titratable acidity(TA)contents were determined using a refractometer,with TA analyzed after 50-fold dilution.Upon completion of the supplemental lighting treatment,dormant buds at physio-logical maturity were sampled for molecular analysis.qRT-PCR analysis was conducted using SYBR Green chemistry,with VvActin1(GenBank accession:XM_010655094.2)serving as the internal refer-ence gene for normalization.Gene-specific primers were designed using Primer Premier 5.0 software,with amplification efficiency validated through standard curve analysis.Relative gene expression levels were calculated using the 2-ΔΔCt method.For phenological assessment,the flowering rate was quantified as the ratio of inflorescence-bearing buds to total observed buds during the subsequent spring phenologi-cal phase.Bud sampling followed a randomized complete block design,with three biological replicates per treatment.[Results]The results demonstrated that supplemental lighting,particularly the RBL 2∶1 and RL treatments,significantly promoted leaf growth and expansion on grapevines.The 2∶1 treatment also markedly increased internode length at 4th-7th nodes on the new canes.Both the RBL 2∶1 and WL treatments showed significantly higher maximum photochemical efficiency of PS Ⅱ(Fv/Fm)and maxi-mum fluorescence(Fm)compared to other treatments.The PI abs value with supplemental lighting treat-ments was significantly higher than that of the CK and shading treatment(ST).The 2∶1 treatment exhib-ited significantly greater Po,TRO/CSm and ABS/CSm per unit leaf area compared to the control and other groups,whereas energy absorption per reaction center(ABS/RC)showed the opposite trend.In terms of photosynthetic characteristics,the daily variation of Ci,Gs and Tr was optimal with the RLB 2∶1 treatment,followed by the WL treatment,both significantly higher than CK and ST.The RLB 2∶1 group exhibited the fastest berry growth rate,with single berry weight significantly higher than other groups,and all the light treatments improved berry shape.At maturity,the TSS content in berries with the RBL 2∶1 and WL groups reached the highest levels at 19.67%and 19.63%,respectively,while TA content showed no significant differences among treatments.Additionally,supplemental lighting posi-tively influenced bud differentiation in the following year.The RBL 2∶1 treatment notably advanced budbreak timing and increased budbreak rates.Moreover,key genes involved in the photoperiod path-way,like VvGI and VvSOC1,were significantly upregulated with the RBL 2∶1 and WL treatments.[Conclusion]In summary,supplementary lighting increased the cane growth rate,leaf area,PI abs val-ue and Fv/Fm value of Shine Muscat grapevines,enhancing light use efficiency.Simultaneously,the ber-ry quality,flower bud differentiation capacity and the expression levels of light-responsive genes were also improved.This provides a solid theoretical foundation for the application of supplementary light-ing technology under rain-sheltered cultivation conditions.

Shine Muscat grapevineSupplementary lightingPhotosynthetic characteristicsFruit qualityFlower bud differentiation

宫小敏、虞光辉、李秀杰、王荣、陈广霞、吴玉森、吴新颖、张志昌、李勃、马玉姣

展开 >

泰安市岱岳区乡村振兴服务中心,山东泰安 271000

山东省葡萄研究院,济南 250100

天津农学院园艺园林学院,天津 300392

山东志昌农业科技发展股份有限公司,山东莒县 276599

展开 >

阳光玫瑰葡萄 补光 光合特性 果实品质 花芽分化

2025

果树学报
中国农业科学院郑州果树研究所

果树学报

北大核心
影响因子:1.486
ISSN:1009-9980
年,卷(期):2025.42(4)